2008
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.45.84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Partitioning and Transmutation on LWR High-Level Waste Disposal

Abstract: Partitioning and/or transmutation (PT) technology affects the disposal concept of high-level radioactive waste (HLW). We studied how cooling in the predisposal storage period may affect the design of the emplacement area in a repository for radioactive wastes produced by a light-water-reactor nuclear system that uses PT technology. Three different fuel cycle scenarios involving PT technology were analyzed: 1) partitioning process only (separation of some fission products), 2) transmutation process only (separa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the remaining elements do not contain large amount of heat generating nuclides nor long-lived α-emitting nuclides, they can be disposed of in a reasonable manner; for example, the area of the disposal site can be reduced by a factor of 100. [1] It should be, however, noted that the remaining elements still contain LLFPs such as 93 Zr and 126 Sn, and hence the deep geological disposal needs to isolate these LLFPs from biosphere. To avoid the deep geological disposal, further partitioning of LLFPs and their transmutation into short-lived or stable ones are required, which seems very tough challenge from viewpoints of energy consumption and cost.…”
Section: Combination Of Partitioning and Transmutationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the remaining elements do not contain large amount of heat generating nuclides nor long-lived α-emitting nuclides, they can be disposed of in a reasonable manner; for example, the area of the disposal site can be reduced by a factor of 100. [1] It should be, however, noted that the remaining elements still contain LLFPs such as 93 Zr and 126 Sn, and hence the deep geological disposal needs to isolate these LLFPs from biosphere. To avoid the deep geological disposal, further partitioning of LLFPs and their transmutation into short-lived or stable ones are required, which seems very tough challenge from viewpoints of energy consumption and cost.…”
Section: Combination Of Partitioning and Transmutationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the number of facilities for the P&T process has been mentioned in some studies, no particular attention has been paid to the duration (OECD, 2009). The reason for this might be that the benefit of P&T for final disposal has been of primary interest (Nishihara et al, 2008;González-Romero, 2011 The relation between the duration and the efficiency of the P&T process is analyzed in the present paper. In addition to burn-up and reprocessing losses, the refreshing time for the fuel and the deployed thermal power of the facility are considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partitioning and transmutation (P&T) have been investigated to reduce the radiotoxicity and storage time of the high-level radioactive waste (HLW) [1][2][3][4][5]. In the present reprocessing, U and Pu are recovered from spent fuel and HLW is vitrified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%