Impact of Partial Manufacturing Flexibility on Production Variability

Abstract

As manufacturers in various industries evolve toward predominantly make-to-order production to better serve their customers' needs, increasing product mix flexibility emerges as a necessary strategy to provide adequate market responsiveness. However, the implications of increased flexibility on overall system performance are widely unknown. We develop analytical models and an optimization-based simulation tool to study the impact of increasing flexibility on shortages, production variability, component inventories, and order variability induced at upstream suppliers in general multiplant multiproduct make-to-order manufacturing systems. Our results show that (1) Partial flexibility leads to a considerable increase in production variability, and consequently in higher component inventory levels and upstream order variability. Although a modest increase in flexibility yields most of the sales benefits, production variability is reduced as more flexibility is added to the system. Consequently, investments in additional flexibility may be justified when component inventories are expensive, or simply by the benefits associated with the smoother production. (2) The performance of flexible systems is highly dependent on the capacity allocation policies implemented. Policies that evenly distribute product demands to the available plants lead to consistently better performance because they avoid the misplacement of inventories by replicating the performance of a single-plant system. These insights and the simulation tool can be used by practitioners to guide the design of their flexible production systems, trading off the initial capital outlay versus the sales benefits and the expected operational costs.manufacturing capacity and flexibility planning, production variability, demand allocation, make-to-order manufacturing systems

Process flexibility: design, evaluation, and applications

“…Muriel et al (2001) showed that a surgery planning system (e.g. a hospital) with a limited flexibility structure could lead to higher instances of the need for rescheduling and larger variability in resource utilization.…”

The impact of cooperation and competition on the performance of flexible decentralized manufacturing networks

“…Based on this measure, it is also found that the system performance is an increasing function of the flexibility of the system. Many other studies for flexibility investment in centralized manufacturing systems have come to the same conclusion (e.g., Muriel et al 2006; Hua and He 2009). However, there are other studies that support the opposite conclusion.…”

Flexibility configurations and preventive maintenance impact on job-shop manufacturing systems

“…They applied a sampling-based decomposition method to devise a feasible production scheduling policy, and used the policy to evaluate the effectiveness of different flexibility structures in simulations. Muriel et al (2006) studied the impact of increasing flexibility at the operational level, and found that limited flexibility could increase production variability more than total flexibility. Bose et al (2016) addressed the strategic capacity planning problem in a multi-product, multi-plant setting under demand uncertainty.…”