Endocrine therapies (ETs) are the preferred treatment options for the management of patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). For many years, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) were considered standard first-line treatment in these patients based on results from several randomized trials showing superiority of the three AIs (letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane) over tamoxifen in all efficacy end points, except for overall survival (OS). 1-3 For instance, in the PO25 study, which investigated letrozole vs tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with ABC, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months with letrozole vs 6 months with tamoxifen (hazard ratio[HR] = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82; P = .0001). 4 Similarly, overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were significantly higher with letrozole vs tamoxifen (ORR 30% vs 20%; P = .0006; CBR 49% vs 38%, P = .001). 4 Importantly, all trials investigating AIs vs tamoxifen included a heterogeneous population of patients in terms of HER2 status. With recognition of the key role of HER2 overexpression in induction of endocrine resistance, and the necessity ofAbstract Endocrine therapy (ET) has been regarded for many years as the standard treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) without visceral crisis. However, the efficacy of single-agent ET is constrained by the development of resistance, attributed to alterations in several intracellular signaling pathways, including those related to cell cycle dysregulation. The cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) are principal regulators of cell cycle progression from the G1-phase into the DNA synthesis (S)-phase. In vitro inhibition of CDK4/6 activity has potent antiproliferative properties against luminal breast cancer cell lines, which are enhanced when combined with traditional ET. This has led to a substantial interest in targeting this pathway to overcome endocrine resistance in the clinic. Three selective CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib) have been approved as first-line therapy in combination with an aromatase inhibitor, or fulvestrant in the case of ribociclib in patients with ER+/HER2− ABC. To date,there is no clue as to which subgroup of patients might benefit most from these combinations. Here, we outline some of the established approaches to overcome endocrine resistance, with special emphasis on the unique mechanism of action of CDK4/6 inhibitors. K E Y W O R D S advanced breast cancer, CDK inhibitors, estrogen receptor-positive, first-line endocrine therapy, HER2-negative, review | 631 AZIM et Al.