2016
DOI: 10.15287/afr.2016.705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of operational factors on fossil energy inputs in motor-manual tree felling and processing: results of two case studies

Abstract: Ignea Gh., Ghaffaryian M.R., Borz, S.A., 2017. Impact of operational factors on fossil energy inputs in motor-manual tree felling and processing: results of two case studies. Ann. For. Res. 60(1): 161-172.Abstract. In many cases tree felling and processing operations are carried out motor-manually and knowledge about fossil fuel consumption and direct energy inputs when using such equipment is required for different purposes starting with operational costing and ending with environmental assessment of forest o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Production (P, m 3 ) of motor-manual tree felling and processing was estimated based on the over-bark volume input in the operations, using the average tree volume (TV, m 3 ) extracted from the harvesting block utilization act, as shown in Table 1, and the number of felled trees during the observations. Total fuel mixture (FM, L) and chain lubrication oil (LO, L) consumptions were measured in the field using the general methods recommended in [38] and described by a similar study [48], with the difference that refueling took place at the free will of the feller. Unit fuel mixture (UFM, L·m −3 ) and chain lubrication oil (ULO, L·m −3 ) were computed at the office based on field recorded data and the estimated production.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production (P, m 3 ) of motor-manual tree felling and processing was estimated based on the over-bark volume input in the operations, using the average tree volume (TV, m 3 ) extracted from the harvesting block utilization act, as shown in Table 1, and the number of felled trees during the observations. Total fuel mixture (FM, L) and chain lubrication oil (LO, L) consumptions were measured in the field using the general methods recommended in [38] and described by a similar study [48], with the difference that refueling took place at the free will of the feller. Unit fuel mixture (UFM, L·m −3 ) and chain lubrication oil (ULO, L·m −3 ) were computed at the office based on field recorded data and the estimated production.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevailing harvesting system combines motor-manual tree felling and processing with extraction done by winch skidders (e.g. Borz et al 2013, Borz et al 2014b, Borz et al 2015, Ignea et al 2017, Moskalik et al 2017. In this operational configuration, final wood assortments are usually bucked at the road side and then transported by trucks to intermediate storage facilities, to forest-based industry plants or to private households.…”
Section: The Romanian Timber Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other studies that accounted for the variability of processed unit size (e.g., [27]), this study assumed less variability in the fuel intake due to the relative homogeneity of drilled pits and moving distances. Therefore, it was assumed that the mean values of fuel consumption would carry enough information to characterize eventual differences between the two tested drill sizes.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%