2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.08.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of omphalocele size on associated conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
37
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, using single omphalocele size criteria across gestation does not account for fetal growth [17,18]. Therefore, since 1997, despite early publications demonstrating no association of OD/AC ratio and prediction of prognosis [19], we introduced as a protocol in omphalocele evaluation the measurement of a herniated sac, description of the contents and measurement of the abdominal defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using single omphalocele size criteria across gestation does not account for fetal growth [17,18]. Therefore, since 1997, despite early publications demonstrating no association of OD/AC ratio and prediction of prognosis [19], we introduced as a protocol in omphalocele evaluation the measurement of a herniated sac, description of the contents and measurement of the abdominal defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We interrogated the literature and found 19 reports [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] of omphalocele associated with intestinal atresia (Table 1). In 8 cases [4,6,7,[11][12][13], the authors concluded the atresia occurred secondary to intestinal compression by a tight defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 3 cases [5,14,15], the authors concluded the omphalocele and intestinal atresias occurred independently of one another. Finally, in 8 cases [8][9][10]16,17], the origins of the atresia were not commented upon. Despite the fact that …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 There might be an association between defect size and type of additional malformation. Kumar et al 19 found intestinal malformations frequently associated with defects <4 cm, whereas cardiac malformations were seen more often in defects >4 cm.…”
Section: Postnatal Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 98%