2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of nutritional support on clinical outcome in patients at nutritional risk: A multicenter, prospective cohort study in Baltimore and Beijing teaching hospitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
81
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
81
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Our multicenter prospective cohort study has showed that of the patients at nutritional risk, the complication rate was significantly lower in the nutritional-support group than in the no-support group, and multivariate analysis showed nutritional support was a protective factor for complications in at-risk patients when adjusted for confounders. 4 The term nutritional risk is defined by the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) as 'chances of a better or worse outcome from disease or surgery according to actual or potential nutritional and metabolic status' 5 and nutritional screening as a 'rapid and simple process conducted by admitting staff or community health-care teams'. 6 Nutritional risk screening is an essential first step in the structured process of nutrition care for identifying cancer patients that will likely benefit from nutrition therapy, 7,8 but it is not routine in most hospitals in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Our multicenter prospective cohort study has showed that of the patients at nutritional risk, the complication rate was significantly lower in the nutritional-support group than in the no-support group, and multivariate analysis showed nutritional support was a protective factor for complications in at-risk patients when adjusted for confounders. 4 The term nutritional risk is defined by the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) as 'chances of a better or worse outcome from disease or surgery according to actual or potential nutritional and metabolic status' 5 and nutritional screening as a 'rapid and simple process conducted by admitting staff or community health-care teams'. 6 Nutritional risk screening is an essential first step in the structured process of nutrition care for identifying cancer patients that will likely benefit from nutrition therapy, 7,8 but it is not routine in most hospitals in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] Several studies have shown favorable effects of NS for patients who are at nutritional risk within the ICU. [6,7] According to the systemic review from DeLegge and Kelley, [14] many hospitals and other organizations in the healthcare field have been gradually reducing the number of NSTs lately even with their proven efficacy through literature, because they try to find ways to lower expenses. According to the 2008 survey by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), only 42% of the respondents, who practice in a hospital setting, reported that they had official NSTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recommendations by Kondrup et al, an NRS score ≥3 indicates a patient who is nutritionally at risk, and a NRS score <3 means there is no nutritional risk. [7,15] 2.4.2. Severance nutrition screening index.…”
Section: Nutritional Support Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…T and/or B lymphocytes in the intestinal mucosa are reduced in patients receiving TPN [20], and intestinal and respiratory IgA levels decrease [21]. Nutrition is a well-known influence on the healing of colonic anostomosis [3,22]. Good nutrition must include adequate intake of energy, nitrogen, vitamins and trace elements [18,23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%