Impact of Neuroimaging Patterns for the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation by Implantable Loop Recorders in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
Abstract:ObjectivesA trial fibrillation (AF) is a well-known etiology of embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), although the optimal detection strategy of AF was not been fully evaluated yet. We assessed AF detection rate by implantable loop recorder (ILR) in patients with ESUS and compared the clinical characteristics and neuroimaging patterns between the patients with AF and AF-free patients.MethodsWe reviewed clinical characteristics and neuroimaging patterns of consecutive patients with who were admitted to … Show more
“…The AF/AFL detection rate in our cohort was similar or relatively higher than in previous studies, which showed that most AF detections by ILR occurred during the first few months [8][9][10][11][12]; however, the cumulative incidence of AF detection continued to increase over a year, albeit slowly. Our study results were also consistent with these findings, but the most distinct observation from our study population was that the interval from the index stroke to ILR implant was remarkably long [3,4,[9][10][11][12][13]. This is not only because of the different study design and population in our study, but also because ILR implants were reimbursed for only recurrent stroke until November 2018 in Korea.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…There is a clinical significance of AF/AFL detection in CS patients because it has an impact on secondary stroke prevention, which is possibly associated with higher anticoagulation incidence, although controversial [6,7]. The AF/AFL detection rate in our cohort was similar or relatively higher than in previous studies, which showed that most AF detections by ILR occurred during the first few months [8][9][10][11][12]; however, the cumulative incidence of AF detection continued to increase over a year, albeit slowly. Our study results were also consistent with these findings, but the most distinct observation from our study population was that the interval from the index stroke to ILR implant was remarkably long [3,4,[9][10][11][12][13].…”
Background/Aims: The reimbursement policy for cryptogenic stroke (CS) was expanded in November 2018 from recurrent strokes to the first stroke episode. No reports have demonstrated whether this policy change has affected trends in implantable loop recorder (ILR) utilization.Methods: We identified patients who received an ILR implant using the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database between July 2016 and October 2021. Patients meeting all the following criteria were considered to have CS indication: 1) prior stroke history, 2) no previous history of atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL), and 3) no maintenance of oral anticoagulant for ≥4 weeks within a year before ILR implant. AF/AFL diagnosed within 3 years after ILR implant or before ILR removal was considered ILR-driven.Results: Among 3,056 patients, 1,001 (32.8%) had CS indications. The total ILR implant number gradually increased for both CS and non-CS indications and the number of CS indication significantly increased after implementing the expanded reimbursement policy. The detection rate for AF/AFL was 26.3% in CS patients over 3 years, which was significantly higher in patients implanted with an ILR within 2 months after stroke than those implanted later.Conclusions: The expanded coverage policy for CS had a significant impact on the number of ILR implantation for CS indication. The diagnostic yield of ILR for AF/AFL detection seems better when ILR is implanted within 2 months than later. Further investigation is needed to demonstrate other clinical benefits and the optimal ILR implantation timing.
“…The AF/AFL detection rate in our cohort was similar or relatively higher than in previous studies, which showed that most AF detections by ILR occurred during the first few months [8][9][10][11][12]; however, the cumulative incidence of AF detection continued to increase over a year, albeit slowly. Our study results were also consistent with these findings, but the most distinct observation from our study population was that the interval from the index stroke to ILR implant was remarkably long [3,4,[9][10][11][12][13]. This is not only because of the different study design and population in our study, but also because ILR implants were reimbursed for only recurrent stroke until November 2018 in Korea.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…There is a clinical significance of AF/AFL detection in CS patients because it has an impact on secondary stroke prevention, which is possibly associated with higher anticoagulation incidence, although controversial [6,7]. The AF/AFL detection rate in our cohort was similar or relatively higher than in previous studies, which showed that most AF detections by ILR occurred during the first few months [8][9][10][11][12]; however, the cumulative incidence of AF detection continued to increase over a year, albeit slowly. Our study results were also consistent with these findings, but the most distinct observation from our study population was that the interval from the index stroke to ILR implant was remarkably long [3,4,[9][10][11][12][13].…”
Background/Aims: The reimbursement policy for cryptogenic stroke (CS) was expanded in November 2018 from recurrent strokes to the first stroke episode. No reports have demonstrated whether this policy change has affected trends in implantable loop recorder (ILR) utilization.Methods: We identified patients who received an ILR implant using the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database between July 2016 and October 2021. Patients meeting all the following criteria were considered to have CS indication: 1) prior stroke history, 2) no previous history of atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL), and 3) no maintenance of oral anticoagulant for ≥4 weeks within a year before ILR implant. AF/AFL diagnosed within 3 years after ILR implant or before ILR removal was considered ILR-driven.Results: Among 3,056 patients, 1,001 (32.8%) had CS indications. The total ILR implant number gradually increased for both CS and non-CS indications and the number of CS indication significantly increased after implementing the expanded reimbursement policy. The detection rate for AF/AFL was 26.3% in CS patients over 3 years, which was significantly higher in patients implanted with an ILR within 2 months after stroke than those implanted later.Conclusions: The expanded coverage policy for CS had a significant impact on the number of ILR implantation for CS indication. The diagnostic yield of ILR for AF/AFL detection seems better when ILR is implanted within 2 months than later. Further investigation is needed to demonstrate other clinical benefits and the optimal ILR implantation timing.
“…Ischemic lesion patterns well represent the stroke mechanism, and a recent study showed that a large territorial infarction in a single vascular territory pattern was associated with AF detection in ESUS patients receiving ILR. 23 Paroxysmal AF related-strokes showed larger lesions and higher NIHSS scores than aortic arch atheroma or PFO related strokes, explained by the large brin containing clot formed from the left atrium. 24 In comparison to stoke related to PFO, strokes related to AF showed con uent lesion with additional small lesions, as PFOs may work as lters, allowing only smaller emboli to pass through the shunt.…”
Background
Detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is important for the secondary prevention of stroke. We investigated the factors associated with the detection of newly diagnosed AF in ESUS patients during follow-up.
Methods
Patients with acute ischemic stroke classified as ESUS were included. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography and Holter to detect the source of embolism. Structural, electrophysiological markers of left atrial cardiopathy (i.e., left atrial enlargement [LAE], non-sustained tachycardia [NSAT]) as well as lesion patterns of ischemic stroke were examined. Implantable loop recorder (ILR) was implanted in selective patients. Sensitivity and positive predictive value analysis was used to assess the predictive value for AF detection.
Results
Among 312 patients with ESUS, AF was detected in 24 (7.7%) patients during follow-up. Patients with AF had a higher prevalence of LAE, NSAT, and the imaging pattern of confluent plus additional lesions in a single vascular territory. Multivariable analysis showed that ILR implantation (hazards ratio 11.497 [95% confidence interval 3.795–34.818]), LAE (3.204 [1.096–9.370]), NSAT (4.070 [1.378–12.018]), and confluent plus additional lesions (4.977 [1.649–15.019]) were independent predictors of AF detection. The sensitivity of detecting AF in those with LAE, NSAT, or confluent plus additional lesions pattern was 91.7%. The positive predictive value of detecting AF in those with LAE, NSAT and confluent plus additional lesions pattern was 40.0%.
Conclusion
In conclusion, patients with LAE, NSAT, or confluent plus additional lesions may benefit from ILR monitoring detecting new AF.
“…In contrast to previous studies, our main focus was to identify the neuroimaging patterns associated with the diagnostic yield of AF in patients with ESUS who received ILR. Yushan et al found that a neuroimaging profile of bilateral infarcts was associated with AF detection using insertable cardiac monitor in ESUS patients ( 18 ) while Kim et al demonstrated a higher AF detection rate associated with whole-territory infarction on brain imaging ( 19 ). Makimoto et al ( 20 ) previously reported that posterior cerebral artery stroke but not in the territory of the vertebral artery may be more frequently related to AF than other stroke localizations in ESUS.…”
BackgroundCovert atrial fibrillation (AF) is a predominant aetiology of embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Evidence suggested that AF is more frequently detected by implantable loop recorder (ILR) than by conventional monitoring. However, the predictive factors associated with occult AF detected using ILRs are not well established yet. In this study we aim to investigate the predictors of AF detection in patients with ESUS undergoing an ILR.MethodsThis observational multi-centre study included consecutive ESUS patients who underwent ILR implantation. The infarcts were divided in deep, cortical infarcts or both. The infarction sites were categorized as anterior and middle cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery with and without brainstem/cerebellum involvement. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate variables associated with AF detection.ResultsOverall, 3,000 patients were initially identified. However, in total, 127 patients who consecutively underwent ILR implantation were included in our analysis. AF was detected in 33 (26%) out of 127 patients. The median follow-up was 411 days. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics and comorbidities between patients with and without AF detected. AF was detected more often after posterior cerebral artery infarct with brainstem/cerebellum involvement (p < 0.001) whereas less often after infarction in the anterior and middle cerebral artery (p = 0.021). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that posterior cerebral artery infarct with brainstem/cerebellum involvement was an independent predictor of AF detection.ConclusionOur study showed that posterior circulation infarcts with brainstem/cerebellum involvement are associated with AF detection in ESUS patients undergoing ILR. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.