2013
DOI: 10.4314/jae.v15i1.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of National Fadama Development Project II on Rice farmers’ profitability in Kogi State, Nigeria

Abstract: N 1,210:40 and N 1,690:50

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean age of the respondents was 50.6 years; this implied that most of the respondents were in their active age but tending towards old age. This contradicted the findings ofOlaolu et al, (2013) where the average age of the respondents was 45.5 years. The table also showed the proportion of the households headed by a male as 84.12 percent, while 15.88 percent of the households were female-headed.…”
contrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The mean age of the respondents was 50.6 years; this implied that most of the respondents were in their active age but tending towards old age. This contradicted the findings ofOlaolu et al, (2013) where the average age of the respondents was 45.5 years. The table also showed the proportion of the households headed by a male as 84.12 percent, while 15.88 percent of the households were female-headed.…”
contrasting
confidence: 90%
“…For instance, Yakubu et al (2019) have documented the factors influencing participation of cassava farmers in Survival Farming Intervention Programme (SFIP). Also, Olaolu et al (2013) have studied the effect of Fadama on participating rice farmers. Olaolu and Akinnagbe (2014) have also documented constraints and strategies to improving agricultural development under Fadama II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SUR models take the underlying covariance structure of the error terms across equations into account. Applications in econometrics and related fields include demand and supply models (Kotakou, 2011;Martin et al, 2007), capital asset pricing models (Hodgson et al, 2002;Pástor and Stambaugh, 2002), chain ladder models (Hubert et al, 2017;Zhang, 2010), vector autoregressive models (Wang, 2010), household consumption and expenditure models (Kuson et al, 2012;Lar et al, 2011), environmental sciences (Olaolu et al, 2011;Zaman et al, 2011), natural sciences (Cadavez and Henningsen, 2012;Hasenauer et al, 1998) and many more.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%