2011
DOI: 10.1021/nn102692m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Nanoscale Topography on Genomics and Proteomics of Adherent Bacteria

Abstract: Bacterial adhesion onto inorganic/nanoengineered surfaces is a key issue in biotechnology and medicine, because it is one of the first necessary steps to determine a general pathogenic event. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of bacteria-surface interaction represents a milestone for planning a new generation of devices with unanimously certified antibacterial characteristics. Here, we show how highly controlled nanostructured substrates impact the bacterial behavior in terms of morphological, genomic, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
82
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…73 Therefore, fabrication of gold nanorods (AuNRs) where manipulation of size, dimension, and aspect ratio is possible is imperative in the advancement of applications such as drug delivery and water treatment. Zhu et al 74 prepared two-and three-dimensional uniform arrays of AuNRs by confined convective arraying techniques and studied the photoheated bacterial effects on E. coli.…”
Section: Nanorodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 Therefore, fabrication of gold nanorods (AuNRs) where manipulation of size, dimension, and aspect ratio is possible is imperative in the advancement of applications such as drug delivery and water treatment. Zhu et al 74 prepared two-and three-dimensional uniform arrays of AuNRs by confined convective arraying techniques and studied the photoheated bacterial effects on E. coli.…”
Section: Nanorodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the appendages were thicker for cells attached to the nonporous substrates than for those present on the porous substrates. In a study by Rizzello et al (27), E. coli cells exposed to gold substrates with nanoscale topography did not express certain type-1 fimbriae, in contrast to cells exposed to smooth gold and glass surfaces. A comprehensive analysis of the E. coli proteome showed that, in addition to fimbria expression, genes involved in stress response and defense mechanisms were expressed differently in cells exposed to nanorough and nanosmooth surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Mechanisms underpinning attachment to nanoscale topographies for mammalian cells is a greatly studied area which has continued to foster significant findings and major contributions to the wealth of knowledge on eukaryotic cell behavior [82][83][84][85]. However, as Hsu et al [48] have described, attachment phenomena for bacterial cells at the nanoscale is less understood, as relatively few reported works have explored the effects of nanoscale topography on bacterial attachment behavior and biofilm formation [23,49,54,86,87]. In fact, some work on bacterial attachment to nanoscale topography resulted in a higher degree of attachment to nanoscaled surfaces rather than planar or micron-scaled topography [88][89][90][91].…”
Section: Pushing Antifouling Topography To the Nanoscalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in the presence of topographical features, they are not easily deformed (as mammalian cells would typically be) [7]. Instead, bacterial appendages are both small and relatively flexible, enabling them to probe nanoscale features [54,86,87]. Thus, these extracellular appendages could play a crucial role in attachment to surface features much smaller than the dimensions of the cells themselves.…”
Section: Pushing Antifouling Topography To the Nanoscalementioning
confidence: 99%