2014
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-536557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of mutational status on outcomes in myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib in the COMFORT-II study

Abstract: Key Points Improvements in splenomegaly and symptoms in patients receiving ruxolitinib occurred regardless of the mutations that were present. Ruxolitinib relieved the negative impact of prognostically detrimental mutations in myelofibrosis patients from the COMFORT-II study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
73
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with PMF who have the CALR type 1/type 1-like mutation constitute a group with a more favorable disease compared with those who are CALR type 2/type 2-like, JAK2V617F or MPLW515x mutated [14][15][16], and patients who result negative for the 3 driver mutations mentioned above (so called "triple negative" patients) are at even greater risk of earlier death [11]. Furthermore, a category of "High Molecular Risk" (HMR) patients was defined to include those patients who harbor any mutation in ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2, IDH1, and IDH2; HMR patients have significantly shorter overall survival and enhanced risk of transformation to acute leukemia [12,17] compared with those who lack prognostically detrimental mutations. In addition, the number of HMR mutations, and widely the number of subclonal mutations, represents a strong negative predictor of survival for patients with PMF [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with PMF who have the CALR type 1/type 1-like mutation constitute a group with a more favorable disease compared with those who are CALR type 2/type 2-like, JAK2V617F or MPLW515x mutated [14][15][16], and patients who result negative for the 3 driver mutations mentioned above (so called "triple negative" patients) are at even greater risk of earlier death [11]. Furthermore, a category of "High Molecular Risk" (HMR) patients was defined to include those patients who harbor any mutation in ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2, IDH1, and IDH2; HMR patients have significantly shorter overall survival and enhanced risk of transformation to acute leukemia [12,17] compared with those who lack prognostically detrimental mutations. In addition, the number of HMR mutations, and widely the number of subclonal mutations, represents a strong negative predictor of survival for patients with PMF [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…78 Guglielmelli et al recently evaluated the impact of molecular abnormalities in a subset of the COMFORT-II cohort (166 of the 219 total patients were evaluated) by genotyping 14 MF-associated prognostically significant mutations, but did not identify any molecular predictors of response to ruxolitinib. 81 In aggregate, these results indicate that any survival benefit of ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-or advanced-phase MF is not occurring as a result of selectively targeting the malignant hematopoietic clone. It is plausible that increased dietary intake and enhanced performance status as a result of improved constitutional symptoms and reduced splenomegaly could contribute to the improved Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for patients treated with ruxolitinib.…”
Section: Inhibiting Jak2 Kinase Activitymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…84 Analysis of the prospective COMFORT-II cohort, which compared ruxolitinib with best available therapy in patients with MF, showed that ruxolitinib improved survival for such HMR patients, which is the first indication that treatment choices may influence the natural history of MF with HMR mutations. 85 Similar studies in PV and ET are awaited. Clinical studies of retrospective cohorts have shown that CALR mutations are associated with a better prognosis and survival in MF and reduced thrombosis in ET, 10,11,35 and this may be relevant for future risk stratification of patients.…”
Section: Clinical Importance Of the Mutational Landscape In Mpnsmentioning
confidence: 98%