2001
DOI: 10.1139/f01-034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) raft-culture on benthic macrofauna, in situ oxygen uptake, and nutrient fluxes in Saldanha Bay, South Africa

Abstract: Culture of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis in a South African bay created organic enrichment and anoxia in sediments. Particulate organic matter (POM) was high under rafts versus the references, especially in the first 10 cm (C = 7.5 versus 0.4%, N = 0.7 versus 0.08%). Total reducible sulphides (TRS) increased threefold downcore (from 0.04 to 0.12%). High C:N ratios (12–15) indicated accumulation of refractory POM, derived mainly from faeces and decaying mussels and foulers. Although O2 uptake by raft sed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with other studies (Grant et al 1995, Chamberlain et al 2001, Crawford et al 2003. Although a shift toward anaerobic metabolism at bivalve culture sites may exist, the impact of the build-up of discarded cultured organisms, and fouling algae or ascidians beneath longline culture sites, is more noticeable than any impacts from bivalve biodeposition (Grant et al 1995, Zhou 2000, Stenton-Dozey et al 2001. In some cases, however, the accumulation of biodeposits in suspended cultures may result in a locally anoxic environment and faunal impoverishment (Haven & MoralesAlamo 1966, Dahlbäck & Gunnarsson 1981, StentonDozey et al 2001, Waite et al 2005.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in agreement with other studies (Grant et al 1995, Chamberlain et al 2001, Crawford et al 2003. Although a shift toward anaerobic metabolism at bivalve culture sites may exist, the impact of the build-up of discarded cultured organisms, and fouling algae or ascidians beneath longline culture sites, is more noticeable than any impacts from bivalve biodeposition (Grant et al 1995, Zhou 2000, Stenton-Dozey et al 2001. In some cases, however, the accumulation of biodeposits in suspended cultures may result in a locally anoxic environment and faunal impoverishment (Haven & MoralesAlamo 1966, Dahlbäck & Gunnarsson 1981, StentonDozey et al 2001, Waite et al 2005.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Grant 1999). As more living biomass is accumulated, the proportion of primary production available for further growth of bivalve biomass decreases , and the biodeposition by dense bivalve populations may be so intense that the stimulated microbial respiration can result in anoxia in underlying sediments (Dahlbäck & Gunnarsson 1981, Stenton-Dozey et al 2001. In recent years, there have been an increasing number of studies on the impacts of cultured bivalves on coastal ecosystems, as the aquaculture industry grows (Kaiser et al 1998, Newell 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, biofouling increases food availability to shellfish through enhanced net primary production (Lodeiros et al 2002;Ross et al 2002;Le Blanc et al 2003). Biofoulers also greatly contribute to the already high biodeposition beneath aquaculture farms (Stenton-Dozey et al 2001). For example, Giles et al (2006) report that of the total deposition under a farm, only 14% can be attributed to mussel biodeposits, suggesting that the remaining 86% is deposited by other sources including biofouling.…”
Section: Environmental Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chl a concentration in the water column positively influenced CR DO . Chl a concentration is an indicator of phytoplankton biomass in the water column and reflects the delivery of fresh organic matter to the sediments (Stenton-Dozey et al 2001, Eyre & Ferguson 2005. The feeding activities of C. fornicata (filtration + biodeposition) are also related to phytoplankton biomass, as well as the subsequent biodeposit remineralization (Stenton-Dozey et al 2001).…”
Section: Environmental Factors Regulating Community Respirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. fornicata also influences carbon fluxes in the benthic community by stimulating the bacterial decomposition processes through its high biodeposition , Ragueneau et al 2002. Increased benthic respiration and mineralization can decrease dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, inducing shifts to hypoxic conditions in sediments (Stenton-Dozey et al 2001). However, the impact of C. fornicata on DO and carbon fluxes has never been assessed at the community level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%