Impact of music therapy and hand massage in the pediatric intensive care unit on pain, fear and stress: Randomized controlled trial

Alemdar, Dilek Küçük; Bulut, Azime; Yılmaz, Gamze

doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2023.05.007

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…22 23 30-63 We denote each study by the author's name and year of publication: Aydin 2017, 30 Tapar 2017, 31 Aghbolagh 2020, 22 Arts 1994, 23 Balan 2009, 32 Çelikol 2019, 33 Schaal 2021, 34 35 Jacobson 1999, 36 37 Hsieh 2017, 38 Karaca 2022, 39 Ikenoue 2020, [40][41][42] Shabandokht-Zarmi 2017, 43 44 Hoseini 2019, 45 46 Momenabadi 2021, 47 Raghibi 2018, 48 Mou 2020, 49 Hartling 2013, 50 51 Jacquier 2022 (52-54)(44, 50, 59), Gerçeker 2019, 55 Nouira 2020, 56 Sahiner 2016, 57 Shahabi 2007, 58 Press 2013, 59 Zengin 2013, 60 Kishida 2019, 61 Fleckenstein 2022 62 and Alemdar 2023. 63 The detailed characteristics of the studies included in this review are presented in online supplemental tables 5 and 6. The 27 RCTs included 3416 participants.…”

Section: Study Selection and Trial Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Acoustic stimulation for relieving pain during venipuncture: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Yamada,

Kitamura,

Inayama

et al. 2023

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo assess whether acoustic stimulations relieve venipuncture pain and determine which stimulation is the most effective type.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases were systematically searched in September 2023.Study selectionRandomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of acoustic stimulations on patients undergoing venipuncture were eligible. Acoustic stimulations were classified into seven categories: five types of acoustic stimulations (music medicine (researcher selected), music medicine (patient selected), music therapy, sounds with linguistic meaning and sounds without linguistic meaning) and two controls (only wearing headphones and no treatment).Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrimary outcomes included self-reported pain intensity assessed during venipuncture and treatment cost, and secondary outcomes were self-reported mental distress and adverse events.ResultsOf 6406 citations, this network meta-analysis included 27 studies including 3416 participants; the mean age was 31.5 years, and 57% were men. Among the five types of acoustic stimulations, only musical interventions, such as music medicine (patient selected) (standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.44 (95% CI: −0.84 to –0.03); low confidence), music medicine (researcher selected) (SMD −0.76 (95% CI: −1.10 to –0.42); low confidence) and music therapy (SMD −0.79 (95% CI: −1.44 to –0.14); low confidence), were associated with improved pain relief during venipuncture compared with no treatment. No significant differences existed between the types of acoustic stimulations. Free-of-charge acoustic stimulations were provided to patients, and no specific adverse events were reported. In many studies, the risk of bias was rated high because of the difficulty of blinding the intervention to the participants and the self-reported pain outcome.ConclusionsMusic interventions were associated with reduced venipuncture pain. Comparisons between types of acoustic stimulations revealed no significant differences. Therefore, music intervention could be a safe and inexpensive pain relief method for venipuncture.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022303852.

show abstract