2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of multiple deprivations on detection, progression and interventions in small renal masses (less than 4 cm) in a population based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have used a large multi-institutional data with validation of part of the cohort by electronic cross-linkage methodology as described previously [ 34 , 35 ]. Although all the centres have a strong interest in and experience of endoscopic diagnosis of upper tract urothelial cancers, lack of randomisation to PNU, no PNU biopsies from normal appearing ureters to confirm diagnosis of CIS prior to nephroureterectomy, lack of information on whether CIS was de nova or concomitant, and a small number of patients with CIS on PNU are some of limitations of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used a large multi-institutional data with validation of part of the cohort by electronic cross-linkage methodology as described previously [ 34 , 35 ]. Although all the centres have a strong interest in and experience of endoscopic diagnosis of upper tract urothelial cancers, lack of randomisation to PNU, no PNU biopsies from normal appearing ureters to confirm diagnosis of CIS prior to nephroureterectomy, lack of information on whether CIS was de nova or concomitant, and a small number of patients with CIS on PNU are some of limitations of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The word file contained unique identifier number (CHI), demographic details, type of presentation, stage, histology, grade, radiological finding and final consensus decision of the multidisciplinary team. Our previous reports have validated the data quality of this process including record linkage methodology through a common identifier (CHI number) using a deterministic record linkage strategy [13][14][15]. Figure 1 summarises the study cohort, flow and systems used for record-linkage.…”
Section: Study Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population of the area was stable with less than 1% migration and more than 98% registered with NHS through a unique identifier called CHI number (Community Health Index-CHI). For various indications, 160,820 abdominal imaging tests (CT, MRI, US) were carried out in a population of 118,600 as reported previously [13]. Since 2005, all new primary renal cancers in the region were managed within a single Health Board and each case was recorded at local multidisciplinary meetings run by a local Urological Cancers Network (TUCAN).…”
Section: Study Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This healthcare region is served by 75 general practices and a single tertiary urological cancer service. All newly diagnosed cancers are reviewed by a local multidisciplinary team, and the meeting records are stored in a database called the “Tayside Urological Cancer Network Database” . Study data was collected using a validated record‐linkage methodology and a unique single number (CHI), as described by our group (see Fig.…”
Section: Patients and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%