2011
DOI: 10.1108/09727981111175984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of MoU on financial performance of public sector enterprises in India

Abstract: PurposeMemorandum of Understanding (MoU) has been conceived as an instrument to quantify/assess social and commercial obligations/performance of central public sector enterprises (PSEs) in India. The purpose of this paper is to measure the financial performance of the MoU PSEs and to compare their performance with PSEs which have not opted for MoU (referred to as non‐MoU PSEs) over a period of 13 years.Design/methodology/approachFinancial ratio is a well accepted technique to assess financial performance. Acco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This MoU system was conceived as an instrument to quantify/assess social and commercial obligations/ performance of central government-owned PSUs, known as Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSE). Gupta et al (2011) measure the financial performance of the CPSEs that had signed an MoU and to compare their performance with CPSEs which have not opted for MoU (referred to as non-MoU PSEs) over a period of 13 years. They measure financial performance of CPSEs based on 15 ratios pertaining to the profitability, efficiency, liquidity and solvency.…”
Section: Corporate Governance In Soementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This MoU system was conceived as an instrument to quantify/assess social and commercial obligations/ performance of central government-owned PSUs, known as Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSE). Gupta et al (2011) measure the financial performance of the CPSEs that had signed an MoU and to compare their performance with CPSEs which have not opted for MoU (referred to as non-MoU PSEs) over a period of 13 years. They measure financial performance of CPSEs based on 15 ratios pertaining to the profitability, efficiency, liquidity and solvency.…”
Section: Corporate Governance In Soementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have observed an increasing preference for non-discounted capital budgeting techniques (Velez and Nieto, 1986;Gupta et al, 2011). Gitman and Forrester (1977) surveyed the level of sophistication used in capital budgeting by leading firms.…”
Section: Capital Budgeting Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the financial performance of profit-making PSEs has shown improvement in a majority of the parameters after disinvestment. The result suggests the better performance of profit-making PSEs compared to loss-incurring PSEs (Gupta et al, 2011).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 93%