Abstract. The elevation history of the Himalaya–Tibet orogen is central to
understanding the evolution and dynamics of both the India–Asia collision
and the Asian monsoons. The surface elevation history of the region is
largely deduced from stable isotope (δ18O, δD)
paleoaltimetry. This method is based on the observed relationship between the
isotopic composition of meteoric waters (δ18Op,
δDp) and surface elevation, and the assumption that
precipitation undergoes Rayleigh distillation under forced ascent. Here we
evaluate how elevation-induced climate change influences the
δ18Op–elevation relationship and whether Rayleigh
distillation is the dominant process affecting
δ18Op. We use an isotope-enabled climate model,
ECHAM-wiso, to show that the Rayleigh distillation process is only dominant
in the monsoonal regions of the Himalayas when the mountains are high. When
the orogen is lowered, local surface recycling and convective processes
become important, as forced ascent is weakened due to weaker Asian monsoons.
As a result, the δ18Op lapse rate in the Himalayas
increases from around −3 to above −0.1 ‰ km−1, and has little
relationship with elevation. On the Tibetan Plateau, the meridional gradient
of δ18O decreases from ∼1 to
∼0.3 ‰ ∘−1 with reduced elevation, primarily due to
enhanced sub-cloud reevaporation under lower relative humidity. Overall, we
report that using δ18Op or
δDp to deduce surface elevation change in the
Himalayan–Tibetan region has severe limitations and demonstrate that the
processes that control annual-mean precipitation-weighted
δ18Op vary by region and with surface elevation.
In summary, we determine that the application of
δ18O paleoaltimetry is only appropriate for 7 of the 50 sites
from which δ18O records have been used to infer past elevations.