2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1042/1/012010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Modelling Details on the Generation Function for a Norwegian Hydropower Producer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work carried out in this paper is based on earlier work on developing improved methods to solve the MTHS problem, as in [7,16]. The main contributions are:…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The work carried out in this paper is based on earlier work on developing improved methods to solve the MTHS problem, as in [7,16]. The main contributions are:…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar behavior might also be imposed by environmental constraints, such as minimum discharge limits for certain periods of the year. While operating at low power outputs, the linear optimization model will observe a higher power output than what is physically feasible and thus overestimate the system's potential profit, as discussed in [7,16]. This overestimation can be avoided by more accurate modeling of the generation function.…”
Section: Generation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While operating at low power outputs, the linear optimization model will observe a higher power output than what is physically feasible and thus overestimate the system's potential profit, as discussed in [7,16]. This overestimation can be avoided by more accurate modelling of the generation function.…”
Section: Generation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%