2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11600-020-00409-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of missing precipitation values on hydrological model output: a case study from the Eddleston Water catchment, Scotland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rainfall is recorded at 0.2 mm resolution at all sites. Only the SEPA Shiplaw rainfall record (from a SBS500 rain gauge) has been used for analysis in this study owing to its central location and completeness of record, thereby avoiding some of the risks to analysis arising from gap‐filling methods (Ruman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rainfall is recorded at 0.2 mm resolution at all sites. Only the SEPA Shiplaw rainfall record (from a SBS500 rain gauge) has been used for analysis in this study owing to its central location and completeness of record, thereby avoiding some of the risks to analysis arising from gap‐filling methods (Ruman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%