2022
DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.22.07238-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of microprocessor prosthetic knee on mobility and quality of life in patients with lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Time since amputation, below-knee amputation, and male gender were predictors of better quality of life and better adaptation to amputation [17]. We showed no effect of the duration of prosthesis as a factor of gait asymmetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Time since amputation, below-knee amputation, and male gender were predictors of better quality of life and better adaptation to amputation [17]. We showed no effect of the duration of prosthesis as a factor of gait asymmetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Furthermore, customization enables prosthetists to incorporate features and functionalities tailored to the user's specific needs and preferences. For instance, individuals with above-knee limb loss may benefit from prosthetic knees equipped with microprocessorcontrolled hydraulic systems, offering enhanced stability and control during various activities [87]. Similarly, users with upper limb loss may opt for prosthetic hands with modular attachments, providing versatile functionality tailored to different tasks and activities.…”
Section: Enhanced Comfort and Functionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review of lower limb prosthesis (LLP) user needs, pain reduction, mobility, social integration, independence, and the ability to walk were the most frequently reported needs while safety was reported as another important need (31). Some of the advanced technology currently used in the clinical setting has resulted in improvements in these areas (32)(33)(34)(35) but further development is necessary to meet these needs (31). Although limited, user-centered design as a component of advancing LLP technology has been reported (22,23), Fanciullacci et al found that transfemoral amputees reported they would like their powered robotic prosthesis to assist in ascending stairs and inclines, but not running (22).…”
Section: Determine User Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%