2015
DOI: 10.4172/2169-026x.1000141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Microfinance on Women Empowerment: An Empirical Evidence from Andhra Pradesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heng (2015) made an evaluation of the impact of the New Financial Services Law in Bolivia and he found that the interest rate caps had an effect on financial inclusion, especially for small borrowers, as microfinance institutions had increased loan sizes and reduced the number of borrowers. 2 Gangadhar and Malyadri (2015) add that women's economic empowerment through microfinance translates into better family decision-making, economic security, and legal awareness, and when combined with participation in seminars, workshops and training, they not only provide self-employment training but also facilitate good decision-making. 3 Because of the ethnic diversity in Bolivia, La Paz and El Alto should not be considered representative of the Bolivian population, that is, the results are not generalizable at national level.…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heng (2015) made an evaluation of the impact of the New Financial Services Law in Bolivia and he found that the interest rate caps had an effect on financial inclusion, especially for small borrowers, as microfinance institutions had increased loan sizes and reduced the number of borrowers. 2 Gangadhar and Malyadri (2015) add that women's economic empowerment through microfinance translates into better family decision-making, economic security, and legal awareness, and when combined with participation in seminars, workshops and training, they not only provide self-employment training but also facilitate good decision-making. 3 Because of the ethnic diversity in Bolivia, La Paz and El Alto should not be considered representative of the Bolivian population, that is, the results are not generalizable at national level.…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Littlefield et al (2003) reported that, since microfinance programs have generally targeted women as clients, access to it empowers women to have high confidence, high participation in family and community decision making, and have high ability to challenge systemic gender inequities. Another study by Gangadhar and Malyadri (2015) revealed that microcredit is an influential tool in improving women empowerment of women for its all indicators such as household decision making, physical mobility, economic security, and so on. Through loans microfinance institutions also empowers women and enable them for greater autonomy and decision-making.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contradictory to Koubȃa (2014) who claim that microfinance programs fail to reach the poorest, generally have a limited effect on income. Robinson (2002) as cited in Gangadhar (2015) indicates that microfinance helps poor people to increase, protect and diversify their income, as well as to accumulate assets, reducing their vulnerability to income and consumption shocks. Microfinance should be directed for investment purposes only, not for consumption smoothing to meet short term household expenditure on food; however, the main impact of microenterprise programs in both the first and third worlds is not to increase income but rather to smooth income in the face of shocks (Taub, 1998;Sherraden et al, 1998;Morduch 1998as cited in Schreiner, 2011 A study in Central America by (Hiatt and Woodworth, 2006) revealed that there is an increase for the daily earning for clients who participated in their village bank for more than a year.…”
Section: Background Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%