2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of micro-scale residual stress on in-situ tensile testing of ductile cast iron: Digital volume correlation vs. model with fully resolved microstructure vs. periodic unit cell

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last years, noticeable efforts to improve the understanding about the relation between the microstructural heterogeneities and mechanical properties of spheroidal graphite cast iron (SGI), particularly for ferritic SGI grades, were undertaken. The analyses involved experimental and computational approaches where different assumptions about graphite nodule distributions, loading conditions, ferritic grain size, among others, were done 1–19 . However, because of the marked heterogeneous nature of SGI added to the complex experimental procedures involved, there is an incomplete understanding about the specific role of each microstructural heterogeneity on the damage mechanisms acting during different stages of the material failure and consequently, on the resulting mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over the last years, noticeable efforts to improve the understanding about the relation between the microstructural heterogeneities and mechanical properties of spheroidal graphite cast iron (SGI), particularly for ferritic SGI grades, were undertaken. The analyses involved experimental and computational approaches where different assumptions about graphite nodule distributions, loading conditions, ferritic grain size, among others, were done 1–19 . However, because of the marked heterogeneous nature of SGI added to the complex experimental procedures involved, there is an incomplete understanding about the specific role of each microstructural heterogeneity on the damage mechanisms acting during different stages of the material failure and consequently, on the resulting mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the role of the graphite nodule on the SGI mechanical properties has been evaluated by different authors 1,2,5,6,12,17 . Despite the application of different assumptions, most recent studies agree that the graphite nodules should not be accounted as a spherical void, particularly at the beginning of the elastoplastic macroscopic behaviour 11,17,19 . The mechanical properties of the graphite nodule and its damage mechanisms for different loading conditions were also investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The graphite nodules were assumed to behave linearly elastically. Their highly inhomogeneous and anisotropic internal structure was accounted for by means of the approach described in detail in [35]. The overall idea is that each nodule is divided into an external shell and a core.…”
Section: Constituent Materials Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the transversely isotropic elastic moduli used for the core and of the isotropic elastic moduli used for the external shell of the nodules are listed in Table 1, whereas the corresponding values of the thermal expansion coefficients as functions of temperature can be found in the supplementary data. A thorough explanation for the choice of these parameters can be found in [35].…”
Section: Constituent Materials Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%