2011
DOI: 10.4155/bio.11.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Methylation of Acyl Glucuronide Metabolites on Incurred Sample Reanalysis Evaluation: Ramiprilat Case Study

Abstract: Following this discovery, a reproducible method was developed and successfully validated for ramipril and ramiprilat. Additional stability tests were performed in the presence of glucuronide and diketopiperazine metabolites of ramipril and ramiprilat to demonstrate the method specificity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that for majority (>50%) of ISR samples in batch B, no two assay values (i.e., original vs repeat 1, original vs repeat 2, or repeat 1 vs 2) were reproducible (data not shown). In such cases, even when the overall ISR results (i.e., after combining results from multiple ISR batches) happen to meet the ISR acceptance criterion, the accuracy of data for the subjects, whose ISR samples consistently demonstrated lack of IS reproducibility, are questionable, Although, the IS CVs and the assay CVs (based on QCs) are similar in the current ISR examples in BE studies, there are instances when IS imprecision do not mimic assay imprecision in BE or PK studies (3,4,17). This is the reason why imprecision in the current paper differentiates between ISR imprecision and assay imprecision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that for majority (>50%) of ISR samples in batch B, no two assay values (i.e., original vs repeat 1, original vs repeat 2, or repeat 1 vs 2) were reproducible (data not shown). In such cases, even when the overall ISR results (i.e., after combining results from multiple ISR batches) happen to meet the ISR acceptance criterion, the accuracy of data for the subjects, whose ISR samples consistently demonstrated lack of IS reproducibility, are questionable, Although, the IS CVs and the assay CVs (based on QCs) are similar in the current ISR examples in BE studies, there are instances when IS imprecision do not mimic assay imprecision in BE or PK studies (3,4,17). This is the reason why imprecision in the current paper differentiates between ISR imprecision and assay imprecision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, the isolated errors in study samples may not be reflected in the calibration standard and QC samples (i.e., spiked samples), especially when the ratio of study samples to spiked samples are high. In fact, for the majority of ISR failures reported, retrospective review of spiked samples rarely indicates problems in spiked samples (3,4). In such cases, an increase in ISR sample size will be useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Samples were collected during two consecutive days at specific times before (pre-dose) and after the dose administration. Collection times were: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8,9,10,12,16,24,28, 32 and 36 h. After collection, blood samples were centrifuged at a temperature of 4°C (1500 × g for 10 min). The plasma obtained was transferred into polypropylene culture tubes and stored at a temperature of -20°.…”
Section: Dosing Sample Collection Processing and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metabolites may convert into their parent drugs through in-source collision-induced dissociation (CID) [7][8][9][10][11][12] or under sample collection, storage, extraction and injection conditions [13][14][15][16][17]. Prior to method development, an extensive literature search was performed to identify all possible FV metabolites and determine their impact on the selectivity of the FV bioanalytical method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%