2006
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.1.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Maternal Directiveness and Overprotectiveness on the Personality Development of a Sample of Individuals With Acquired Blindness

Abstract: The literature has frequently shown how mothers of children with blindness tend to be highly directive and overprotective with their children. This study investigated whether this maternal interactive style can have negative consequences on the psychological development of persons with acquired blindness, or whether it can be considered functional and appropriate to these individuals' needs during childhood. This aim was pursued by adopting attachment theory as a conceptual reference and administering the Adul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the low frequency of exploration behaviors displayed toward the two stimuli by control participants, it is interesting to note that, according to the attachment theory, the ability to explore arises as a consequence of the perception of a safety state, which control participants did not seem to have (e.g., Ardito et al, 2004 ; Steele et al, 2004 ; Cookman, 2005 ; Adenzato et al, 2006 ; Cicerale et al, 2013 ). In particular, according to the attachment theory humans are motivated to maintain a dynamic balance between familiarity-preserving, stress-reducing behaviors (attachment to protective individuals and to familiar home sites, retreat from the strange and novel) and antithetical exploratory and information-seeking behaviors ( Bretherton, 1992 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the low frequency of exploration behaviors displayed toward the two stimuli by control participants, it is interesting to note that, according to the attachment theory, the ability to explore arises as a consequence of the perception of a safety state, which control participants did not seem to have (e.g., Ardito et al, 2004 ; Steele et al, 2004 ; Cookman, 2005 ; Adenzato et al, 2006 ; Cicerale et al, 2013 ). In particular, according to the attachment theory humans are motivated to maintain a dynamic balance between familiarity-preserving, stress-reducing behaviors (attachment to protective individuals and to familiar home sites, retreat from the strange and novel) and antithetical exploratory and information-seeking behaviors ( Bretherton, 1992 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the experimental tasks we used elicit mainly reflective processes of social cognition. Further studies should integrate this kind of task with others able to elicit more automatic processes as well: as face regions outside from the eyes can convey a number of socially relevant information, of particular interest are the tasks concerning the evaluation of faces expressing basic and social emotions [102] – [106] . Despite these limitations, we believe the findings presented here may be useful to help us better understand the social-cognitive profile of patients with AN and to contribute to the development of effective interventions based on the ways in which patients with AN actually perceive their social environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of many prior studies suggest that mothers of children with Down syndrome, like mothers of children with other forms of intellectual disability (ID), tend to be highly directive in their interactions (Crawley & Spiker 1983;Mahoney 1988;Mahoney et al 1990;Roach et al 1998). Although initially directiveness was viewed as a negative feature, more currently it is seen as potentially supportive of a child with an ID, especially when directives are not intrusive and are embedded within a series of supportive behaviours (Crawley & Spiker 1983;Marfo 1990;Roach et al 1998;Adenzato et al 2006;Hauser-Cram et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%