2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-005-9058-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Marriage on HIV/AIDS Risk Behaviors Among Impoverished, At-Risk Couples: A Multilevel Latent Variable Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one of the first applications of multilevel SEM to HIV risk reduction, Stein et al (2007) found that couple-level effects among IDU couples accounted for greater variance in behavior than individual-level effects. The generalizability of this analytic technique to other theoretical approaches to HIV risk reduction that have had empirical success in individual-level analyses (e.g., the IMB model; Fisher and Fisher 1992) holds promise but continues to require close examination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one of the first applications of multilevel SEM to HIV risk reduction, Stein et al (2007) found that couple-level effects among IDU couples accounted for greater variance in behavior than individual-level effects. The generalizability of this analytic technique to other theoretical approaches to HIV risk reduction that have had empirical success in individual-level analyses (e.g., the IMB model; Fisher and Fisher 1992) holds promise but continues to require close examination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, this research sought to enhance quantitative understanding of the risk factors for HIV infection within relationships. It was hypothesized that, as in past multi-level latent variable analyses testing other theoretical models (e.g., Stein et al 2007), the dyadic-level RELO-IMB model would provide for a better fitting model than the traditional, individuallevel model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not surprising as increased odds of unprotected sex (or lower odds of condom use) with a primary or steady partner have been reported in the literature (Grangeiro et al, 2012;Kilbourne et al, 2002;Tucker et al, 2010;Tucker et al, 2013). Moreover, Stein, Nyamathi, Ullman and Bentler (2007) found that marriage and lower condom use were significantly correlated in their confirmatory factor analysis, but not in their predictive model. Furthermore, relationship commitment has been significantly associated with more unprotected sex among homeless men and women and women living in shelters (Kennedy et al, 2010;Kennedy et al, 2013;Tucker, Elliott, Wenzel, & Hambarsoomian, 2007).…”
Section: Chapter 4 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It is important to note that unprotected sex with a spouse or perceived monogamous partner does not preclude the risk of STI transmission. One or both parties may have concurrent partners (Stein et al, 2007) that are undisclosed and/or may engage in needle-sharing if injecting drugs. STI risk-reduction interventions should address the risks involved in unprotected sex with spouses or in more "serious" relationships where increased trust and relationship commitment may be involved (Brown et al, 2012).…”
Section: Chapter 4 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation