The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02707-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Male Partner Involvement on Women’s Adherence to the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring During a Phase III HIV Prevention Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stronger relationship between partner acceptability and adherence was observed among older participants. This trend is supported by other qualitative findings from ASPIRE, where partner perceptions were often cited as a prominent influencer of acceptability and adherence [ 12 ] as well as work that looked at the relationship between reported partner support and adherence in ASPIRE [ 20 ]. Importantly, perceived partner acceptability does not necessarily equate to partner support, highlighting the importance of exploring these relationships both quantitatively and qualitatively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A stronger relationship between partner acceptability and adherence was observed among older participants. This trend is supported by other qualitative findings from ASPIRE, where partner perceptions were often cited as a prominent influencer of acceptability and adherence [ 12 ] as well as work that looked at the relationship between reported partner support and adherence in ASPIRE [ 20 ]. Importantly, perceived partner acceptability does not necessarily equate to partner support, highlighting the importance of exploring these relationships both quantitatively and qualitatively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…While ring removals were infrequent, several participants reported ring outages due to partner‐related concerns. Prior studies have highlighted the important role of male partners on ring use and acceptability [32‐34]. A few participants in each arm reported removing the ring during menses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with HIV were supported not only in psychological well-being and financial status but also with medical care and daily activities. The significant correlation between partner support and adherence to ART was well documented; women were more likely to have low adherence if they had an unsupportive male partner [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%