2017
DOI: 10.4038/jnsfsr.v45i2.8176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Madden Julian oscillation (MJO) and other meteorological phenomena on the heavy rainfall event from 19th − 28th December, 2014 over Sri Lanka

Abstract: Abstract:to 28 Keywords

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite being prone to catastrophic floods and landslides every year, there has been a limited investigation of extreme precipitation events in Sri Lanka. Previous studies mainly focused on analyzing synoptic features during individual heavy rainfall events (e.g., Koralegedara et al., 2019; Warnasooriya et al., 2022) and the role of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO; Jayawardena et al., 2017) in triggering such events. As a result, there has not been any attempt to examine the association of extreme precipitation events with weather patterns in Sri Lanka, which could ultimately help in identifying periods with an increased likelihood of extreme precipitation and floods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being prone to catastrophic floods and landslides every year, there has been a limited investigation of extreme precipitation events in Sri Lanka. Previous studies mainly focused on analyzing synoptic features during individual heavy rainfall events (e.g., Koralegedara et al., 2019; Warnasooriya et al., 2022) and the role of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO; Jayawardena et al., 2017) in triggering such events. As a result, there has not been any attempt to examine the association of extreme precipitation events with weather patterns in Sri Lanka, which could ultimately help in identifying periods with an increased likelihood of extreme precipitation and floods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%