2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2016.09.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of lymph node evaluation in adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy settings on survival outcomes in Wilms tumour: a review of 185 cases from a single institution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the improved staging accuracy and potential survival benefit associated with lymph node dissection in WT surgeries, patients are routinely under-sampled. In the series presented by Nanda et al ( 20 ), 75% of patients had fewer than seven nodes sampled and other trials have reported no lymph node sampling in 9% of patients ( 9 , 17 , 19 ). When lymph node dissection is performed, intraoperative discrimination between benign and malignant lymph nodes is relatively poor.…”
Section: Wtmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the improved staging accuracy and potential survival benefit associated with lymph node dissection in WT surgeries, patients are routinely under-sampled. In the series presented by Nanda et al ( 20 ), 75% of patients had fewer than seven nodes sampled and other trials have reported no lymph node sampling in 9% of patients ( 9 , 17 , 19 ). When lymph node dissection is performed, intraoperative discrimination between benign and malignant lymph nodes is relatively poor.…”
Section: Wtmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For stage I patients who often do not receive adjuvant therapy, Shamberger et al determined that retroperitoneal nodal dissection also reduced the risk of recurrence ( 19 ). While there is no standard number of nodes to sample during WT surgeries, some studies have shown that increasing the number of nodes (many have used >7 nodes as a threshold value) improves detection of nodal involvement ( 18 , 20 ), although nodal positivity was shown to negatively impact survival ( 9 , 21 ).…”
Section: Wtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S3). 30,[42][43][44][45][46][47] 10. The panel recommends sampling of lymph nodes at the time of resection of WT; pathologic assessment of lymph node histology before and after chemotherapy is feasible and of value in staging.…”
Section: Very Low Certaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequately documented surgical staging should include lymph node sampling and documentation of local invasion, seeding or tumor spillage, and vascular extension (Supplemental Table S3). 28,[40][41][42][43][44][45] The panel recommends sampling of lymph nodes at the time of resection of WT; pathologic assessment of lymph node histology before and after chemotherapy is feasible and of value in staging. (Strong recommendation; Quality of evidence: Very Low) Panel deliberation.…”
Section: Operative Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 Lymph node sampling is an integral part of staging and should be completed at the time of tumor resection, regardless of whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given. 28,[40][41][42][43][44][45] At the time of sampling, five to seven lymph nodes should be obtained to reduce the risk of a false-negative finding. 41,44 The panel recommends neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the management of WT with inferior vena cava thrombus extension.…”
Section: Operative Phasementioning
confidence: 99%