2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/percomw.2014.6815213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of location history collection schemes on observed human mobility features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we extend a previous work [12] with the following contributions: (i) in the previous work just the MIT data set was analyzed, here we add a second data set, the UC3M data set, to our analysis; (ii) we transform both data sets (MIT and UC3M) so that we have the same mobility data as if they were collected using the two data collections approaches under study: the one carried out by the mobile phone, and the one carried out by the network; (iii) using the data sets and collection approaches described before, we derived some of the most common mobility features in the literature, highlighting the different statistical distributions obtained in each case; (iv) we propose three filtering techniques to detect and reduce the bias introduced by the collection approaches; and (v) we show how the filtering process affects the observed mobility features under study, by comparing the results to the previous ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Specifically, we extend a previous work [12] with the following contributions: (i) in the previous work just the MIT data set was analyzed, here we add a second data set, the UC3M data set, to our analysis; (ii) we transform both data sets (MIT and UC3M) so that we have the same mobility data as if they were collected using the two data collections approaches under study: the one carried out by the mobile phone, and the one carried out by the network; (iii) using the data sets and collection approaches described before, we derived some of the most common mobility features in the literature, highlighting the different statistical distributions obtained in each case; (iv) we propose three filtering techniques to detect and reduce the bias introduced by the collection approaches; and (v) we show how the filtering process affects the observed mobility features under study, by comparing the results to the previous ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The authors of [17] characterise human mobility by selecting features as the amount of movement, the distributions of visits to PoIs, the entropy of a user's location history and its degree of predictability. We opted for the adoption of the entropy in our work as the characteristic feature, in order to provide a measure of the uncertainty of users' movements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We studied the impact of cellular-based location collection schemes on observed human mobility features [14]. We identified the most basic mobility features: (i) amount of movement (number of cell changes made per day), (ii) variety of visited locations (how many different locations are visited by the user per day), (iii) visits distribution (fraction of visits concentrated by each location), (iv) randomness (uncertainty we have about the next event in a sequence), and (v) predictability (bound of the maximum percentage of correct predictions the best algorithm could ever attain).…”
Section: B Analyzing the Impact Of Individual Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified the most basic mobility features: (i) amount of movement (number of cell changes made per day), (ii) variety of visited locations (how many different locations are visited by the user per day), (iii) visits distribution (fraction of visits concentrated by each location), (iv) randomness (uncertainty we have about the next event in a sequence), and (v) predictability (bound of the maximum percentage of correct predictions the best algorithm could ever attain). We observed that the traces based on data stored in the network nodes themselves, recording the base transceiver station (BTS) to which the device is connected when the user is making or receiving a call, or sending or receiving a short message, known as call-detailed records (CDR), lead to biased mobility indicators [14].…”
Section: B Analyzing the Impact Of Individual Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%