2010
DOI: 10.2478/v10086-010-0009-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of light intensity on the results of rearing juvenile pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), in recirculating aquaculture systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results differed from those obtained when rearing larger pikeperch (>100 g) in which larger feed pellet sizes increased final body weight variation coefficients (Zakêoe et al 2013, Mattila andKoskela 2017). The body weight variation coefficient in this study (17.3-32.0%) was lower than those noted in other studies on pikeperch with similar initial body weights (Wang et al 2009), but they were similar to results reported in other studies (Koz³owski et al 2010(Koz³owski et al , 2014.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results differed from those obtained when rearing larger pikeperch (>100 g) in which larger feed pellet sizes increased final body weight variation coefficients (Zakêoe et al 2013, Mattila andKoskela 2017). The body weight variation coefficient in this study (17.3-32.0%) was lower than those noted in other studies on pikeperch with similar initial body weights (Wang et al 2009), but they were similar to results reported in other studies (Koz³owski et al 2010(Koz³owski et al , 2014.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The values of SGR obtained in experiment I were similar to those published by Molnár et al (2004) for juvenile pikeperch with an initial body weight of 0.91 g at 23.0°C. The SGR values in experiment II (3.06-3.70 % d -1 ) were higher than those reported by Koz³owski et al (2010) for fish with a BW i of 4.4 g (SGR 2.62-2.70 % d -1 at 20.0°C) and Wang et al (2009) for pikeperch with a BW i of 6.4 g (SGR 1.2-2.0 % d -1 at 20-28°C), while they were similar to those noted by Koz³owski et al (2014) for pikeperch with a BW i of 6.1 g at 24.4°C ). In experiment III, SGR values ranged from 2.54 to 2.81 % d -1 and were twice as high as those reported by Schulz et al (2005) for pikeperch with a BW i of 15.2 g at 22.6°C ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a wide range of teleost species, including flatfishes, light intensity has been seen to influence juvenile growth in association with several other physiological parameters, such as feed intake, survival rate, immune response or dietary nutrient composition, according to species preferences (Kozłowski et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2013;Tian et al, 2015;Bögner et al, 2018). In all cases, better growth was observed at lower light intensities, sometimes associated with differences in stress markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polish researchers (Kozłowski et al, 2010) conducted two experiments on growing Sander lucioperca in recirculating aquaculture systems under different light conditions. In group 1, the juveniles had an initial mass of 6.1 g, and in the group 2, it was 42.2 g. It turned out that in both cases, the fish grew better in lower light 45.1 and 1.2 lx, respectively.…”
Section: Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%