2002
DOI: 10.1038/nn960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex

Abstract: Visual object recognition is thought to depend on experienceinduced changes in inferotemporal (IT) cortex, such that neurons become more selective for (or more responsive to) learned images [1][2][3][4] . This view is consistent with evidence showing that lesions in IT interfere with pattern recognition 5,6 , that neurons in IT are pattern-selective 5,6 and that IT is a site of experience-dependent plasticity. Plasticity has been shown in IT by the use of three approaches: (i) repeated exposure to a stimulus o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
211
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
24
211
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the binding of letters into words might be related to the representation of complex objects in IT cortex through the coactivation of neurons tuned to their elementary parts (Tsunoda et al, 2001). Binding of letters may also be based on more holistic coding, as suggested by the recent demonstration that single IT neurons develop selectivity for learned complex shapes, above and beyond what could be expected from the additive influence of their component parts (Baker et al, 2002). Such neurophysiological mechanisms may provide a neuronal basis for the acquisition of invariant visual word recognition in humans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the binding of letters into words might be related to the representation of complex objects in IT cortex through the coactivation of neurons tuned to their elementary parts (Tsunoda et al, 2001). Binding of letters may also be based on more holistic coding, as suggested by the recent demonstration that single IT neurons develop selectivity for learned complex shapes, above and beyond what could be expected from the additive influence of their component parts (Baker et al, 2002). Such neurophysiological mechanisms may provide a neuronal basis for the acquisition of invariant visual word recognition in humans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study (49), we found that 10 h of training on a novel object category produces a nearly 2-fold response to trained compared with untrained categories in some voxels in the ventral visual pathway, which was not present before training. Similarly, neurophysiological studies in nonhuman primates have found that training on discrimination and recognition of visual objects can lead to changes in the selectivity of neural responses in the inferior temporal cortex, a region critical for object recognition (50,51). Finally, experience with visual objects can lead to clustering of neurons with similar selectivity within the inferior temporal cortex (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Attentional enhancement of visual response strength in extrastriate cortex depends on the simultaneous presence of competing images elsewhere in the visual field (31,53,54). The strength of the response to an isolated foveal image is not affected by whether the monkey is processing it actively or merely is maintaining passive fixation (5,55). Nor is the strength of the response enhanced by making the image surprising through the violation of expectations other than those based on learned image-image transitional rules (56,57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%