2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2807-5_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of landscape and corridor design on primates in a large-scale industrial tropical plantation landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results of living situation of animals/birds/insects reflect the total number of animals and migration situation, and demonstrate the health condition of ecosystem from the perspective of biology (Nasi et al 2009). Ecological corridors are believed to facilitate movement between connected patches of a habitat, which increases gene flow, promotes the reestablishment of locally extinct populations, and increases species diversity in otherwise isolated areas (Tilman, Kareiva 1997).…”
Section: Natural Environmentsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…These results of living situation of animals/birds/insects reflect the total number of animals and migration situation, and demonstrate the health condition of ecosystem from the perspective of biology (Nasi et al 2009). Ecological corridors are believed to facilitate movement between connected patches of a habitat, which increases gene flow, promotes the reestablishment of locally extinct populations, and increases species diversity in otherwise isolated areas (Tilman, Kareiva 1997).…”
Section: Natural Environmentsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…It is possible for matrix habitat to become a mutually useful "shared space" (Lee 2010 ) between humans and nonhuman primates. Some studies indicate that the economic loss associated with crop-raiding is considerably less than that perceived by land owners (Siex and Struhsaker 1999 ;Williams-Guillén et al 2006 ;Riley 2007 ), and others report primate use of agricultural lands with no crop damage at all (Muñoz et al 2006 ;Nasi et al 2008 ). Farmers can often reduce the impact of crop-raiding by planting less desirable crops, such as coffee or tea, as a buffer zone between highly favored crops and forested areas (Nijman and Nekaris 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Plantations may present a low-contrast, permeable matrix where its habitat attributes are similar to previous land cover and surrounding forested areas (Lantschner et al, 2008;Pawson et al, 2008). Such plantations can support many species, including those of conservation concern (Berndt et al, 2008;Brockerhoff et al, 2008), assist dispersal and colonisation through increased connectivity of embedded remnants (Renjifo, 2001;Lindenmayer and Hobbs, 2007;Nasi et al, 2008), and buffer remnants from microclimatic edge effects (Denyer et al, 2006). In general, plantations have better conservation potential than agricultural land (Grabham et al, 2002;Loyn et al, 2007;Pawson et al, 2008) and may provide habitat heterogeneity that help to retain species on a landscape-scale, and potentially, regional level (Lindenmayer and Hobbs, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native plantations in particular have greater potential in sheltering native fauna than exotic plantations (Farwig et al, 2008). However, depending on the history of land-use prior to plantation establishment, landscape context, management goal and intensity, and taxa or species-specific requirements, plantations may support a depauperate or a different suite of fauna from forests, or remain impoverished in high conservation value species for decades (Parris and Lindenmayer, 2004;Aubin et al, 2008;Nasi et al, 2008;van Halder et al, 2008), so there is a need to understand the level of contribution of plantations in enhancing the prospect of species or guilds of conservation concern in specific areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%