Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on directional coronary atherectomy

Abstract

In contrast to the luminogram of coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has proven to accurately assess both coronary lumen and vessel morphology due to its 360 degrees imaging capacity. Directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) improves the coronary lumen by removing plaque mass rather than stretching the vessel and compressing the plaque as with conventional percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. In an attempt to optimize the procedural result of DCA we prospectively investigated the impact of IVUS guidance in a head to head comparison to on-line quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) on the result of DCA. In 16 consecutive patients IVUS demonstrated significant residual plaque mass after DCA irrespective of a satisfactory angiographic result. After a mean of 9 +/- 2 cuts luminal improvement was obtained with an area stenosis by angiography of 39 +/- 17% and by IVUS of 50 +/- 10% (p < 0.05), a diameter stenosis by angiography of 23 +/- 10% and IVUS of 35 +/- 14% (p < 0.05) and finally a minimal lumen diameter (MLD) by angiography of 2.9 +/- 0.5 mm and by IVUS of 2.3 +/- 0.5 mm (p < 0.005). After both on-line QCA and IVUS measurements a second series of 7 +/- 2 cuts were initiated to debulk more atheroma and improve stenosis dimensions. After additional cuts IVUS revealed further luminal improvement with an area stenosis by angiography of 25 +/- 16% and IVUS of 21 +/- 18% (n.s.), a diameter stenosis by angiography of 16 +/- 11% and by IVUS of 13 +/- 19% (n.s.) and finally a MLD by angiography of 3.1 +/- 0.5 mm and by IVUS of 2.8 +/- 0.3 mm (p < 0.05). Intraprocedural use of IVUS is superior to on-line QCA to assess the immediate result of DCA. IVUS-guided DCA results in more effective atheroma debulking than luminographic evaluation. Results of larger follow-up studies are needed to substantiate the intraprocedural advantage of IVUS with DCA.

Advanced Imaging in Limb Salvage

“…studies examining ivus in the coronary vasculature indicate that, compared to ivus, dsa underestimates residual atheroma burden following atherectomy. 18,19 ivus allows for evaluation of plaque morphology, plaque eccentricity, and lesion length, often helping in procedural decision making; it also demonstrates plaque fracture and arterial wall dissection more often than angiography. Coronary angiograms frequently underestimate disease burden, whereas ivus identifies residual plaque burden and minimal lumen diameter as the most powerful predictors of clinical outcome (restenosis).…”