2017
DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of intervention aimed at improving the integration of oncology units and local palliative care services: results of the multicentre prospective sequential MIRTO study

Abstract: BackgroundChemotherapy (CT) in patients with advanced cancer (ACP) near the end of life is an increasing practice of oncology units. A closer integration with palliative care (PC) services could reduce the use of potentially harmful CT. This prospective study is aimed at assessing whether a more integrated care model could reduce CT use near the end of life and increase local PC service utilisation.MethodsThe study enrolled sequentially two cohorts of ACP with an estimated life expectancy of ≤6 months. In the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly reported barriers to improving uptake of CW recommendations were preconceived views and routines of providers and reluctance to adopt new practices (Fig 1). 22,35,36,38,[40][41][42] Additional barriers included lack of awareness of the CW recommendations, 22 lack of validated tools or standardized processes to support practice change, 39 and lack of resources 37 to support change. Reports also cited providers' fear of longer clinic visits stemming from additional patient counseling regarding low-value practices 34 and that fee for service structures do not motivate the reduction of low-value service provision.…”
Section: Barriers and Facilitators Of Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly reported barriers to improving uptake of CW recommendations were preconceived views and routines of providers and reluctance to adopt new practices (Fig 1). 22,35,36,38,[40][41][42] Additional barriers included lack of awareness of the CW recommendations, 22 lack of validated tools or standardized processes to support practice change, 39 and lack of resources 37 to support change. Reports also cited providers' fear of longer clinic visits stemming from additional patient counseling regarding low-value practices 34 and that fee for service structures do not motivate the reduction of low-value service provision.…”
Section: Barriers and Facilitators Of Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46,53 Therefore, when the identified facilitators and barriers are used as implementation strategies in an environment where compensation rewards value, programs focus on cost-savings, and there is easy access to data needed to provide continuous audit and feedback to providers, a comprehensive multipronged approach arises that can lead to sustainable change in practice (Table 2). 22,35,36,38,[40][41][42] Lack of knowledge about Choosing Wisely recommendations 54 Reluctance to modify existing routines and adopt new practices because of comfort and time required to change practice 22,35,36,38,[40][41][42] Fear that counseling will lead to longer visits 34 Fear that decreasing use of low-value evaluations will lead to missed disease progression/diagnoses 37 Patient request/insist on undertaking additional follow-up investigations and procedures 22 Lack of validated tools to support decision making 39 Lack of standardized processes in clinical settings 39 Lack of resources to support successful implementation in clinical settings 55 Use technology to facilitate change: order sets and forced functions Disseminate information/materials in convenient, easily accessible formats to stakeholders Make available tools for physician champions (handouts, pamphlets, and presentations) to educate other providers in their practice and promote change in clinical settings Abbreviations: CMS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; CW, Choosing Wisely.…”
Section: The Path Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the crucial contribution of integrating early palliative care in cancer management (Temel et al, 2010 ; Bandieri et al, 2020 ), no definitive change in the overtreatment of cancer patients with advanced disease, particularly those at the end of life, has been seen yet (Martoni et al, 2017 ; Zhang et al, 2021 ). Hospitalization in advanced-stage disease, given its poor prognosis, can itself be considered a form of overtreatment (El-Jawahri et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%