2017
DOI: 10.1166/asl.2017.9839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Internal Audit Function on Internal Control Disclosure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hanapiyah et al (2016) measure HG in terms of leadership, integrity, religiosity, spirituality and culture. Other studies have measured human governance by board independence, board size, board education, gender diversity, board age, board education level, training attended by board members, sound internal control system and ethical commitments (Said & Hassan, 2018;Ting et al, 2014;Setiawan & Djajadikerta, 2017;Hashim et al, 2020). Hanapiyah et al (2016) have measured HG using surveys, while Ting et al (2014) have measured using annual reports.…”
Section: Relationship Between Human Governance and Sustainability Rep...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hanapiyah et al (2016) measure HG in terms of leadership, integrity, religiosity, spirituality and culture. Other studies have measured human governance by board independence, board size, board education, gender diversity, board age, board education level, training attended by board members, sound internal control system and ethical commitments (Said & Hassan, 2018;Ting et al, 2014;Setiawan & Djajadikerta, 2017;Hashim et al, 2020). Hanapiyah et al (2016) have measured HG using surveys, while Ting et al (2014) have measured using annual reports.…”
Section: Relationship Between Human Governance and Sustainability Rep...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender, age, training, director experience and expertise increases CSR performance (Jamil et al, 2020) found that the presence of female BOD has a positive influence of sustainability disclosure. Setiawan and Djajadikerta (2017) measured the internal control system using 6 dimensions and they are content of internal control disclosure, implementation of internal control, role of internal control, objective of internal control, internal control framework, and a separate dimension section of internal control. Hashim et al (2020) measured ethical commitment by looking at six dimensions: corporate ethical values, action to promote ethics, whistleblowing policy and code of ethics.…”
Section: Human Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, there were six measurement indicators relating to the internal control disclosure system. The indicators include the contents of the internal control system, the implementation of the internal control system, the role of the internal control system, the objectives of the internal control system, the internal control system framework, and the presentation of internal control disclosure system (Setiawan, 2016). The list of companies' internal control disclosure system index can be found in Appendix 1.…”
Section: Data Collection and Processing Technicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next following by dividing the total index expressed by the maximum value of all index with the formula as depicted in Table 1. The measurement of disclosure of the internal control system in this study used Setiawan (2016) approach. This approach is seen as acceptable as it exceeds the benchmark criteria set by the Capital Market Supervisory Body through Kep-431/BL/2012 No.…”
Section: Data Collection and Processing Technicalmentioning
confidence: 99%