2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/vtc2020-spring48590.2020.9128852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Interference on OFDM based Radars

Abstract: The goal of this work is to identify the possible degradations on a Wi-Fi based Passive Radar in the presence of an interferer. We assume that the signal-of-opportunity and the interference are 802.11ax compliant. The mathematical model derived for the interference shows that in a synchronized case, the interference may yield ghost targets. When a more occasional interference scenario is considered, the range/Doppler Map accuracy decreases significantly. Furthermore, numerical results are provided to quantify … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to save space, and focus on more important parts of the system model, we assume that the received OFDM signals already went through the following process: i) correlation is applied to the Short Training Fields to find the starting time of the received OFDM frames; ii) Carrier Frequency Offset is estimated from the High‐Efficiency Long Training Fields and compensated accordingly; iii) Cyclic Prefix samples are dropped, and the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of each OFDM symbol is computed; iv) through zero‐forcing, the CTF is estimated [27, 28], which can be written as with q = 0… Q − 1, n = 0… N − 1, m = 0… M − 1. leftrightHˆfalse[q,n,mfalse]=p=1PαpωqτpQTωnsinθpωfpmTfright+zfalse[q,n,mfalse] $\begin{array}{r}\hfill \widehat{H}[q,n,m]=\sum\limits _{p=1}^{P}\left({\alpha }_{p}\,\omega \left(\frac{q{\tau }_{p}}{QT}\right)\,\omega \left(n\mathrm{sin}\left({\theta }_{p}\right)\right)\,\omega \left({f}_{p}m{T}_{f}\right)\right.\\ \hfill +\left.z[q,n,m]\right)\end{array}$ …”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to save space, and focus on more important parts of the system model, we assume that the received OFDM signals already went through the following process: i) correlation is applied to the Short Training Fields to find the starting time of the received OFDM frames; ii) Carrier Frequency Offset is estimated from the High‐Efficiency Long Training Fields and compensated accordingly; iii) Cyclic Prefix samples are dropped, and the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of each OFDM symbol is computed; iv) through zero‐forcing, the CTF is estimated [27, 28], which can be written as with q = 0… Q − 1, n = 0… N − 1, m = 0… M − 1. leftrightHˆfalse[q,n,mfalse]=p=1PαpωqτpQTωnsinθpωfpmTfright+zfalse[q,n,mfalse] $\begin{array}{r}\hfill \widehat{H}[q,n,m]=\sum\limits _{p=1}^{P}\left({\alpha }_{p}\,\omega \left(\frac{q{\tau }_{p}}{QT}\right)\,\omega \left(n\mathrm{sin}\left({\theta }_{p}\right)\right)\,\omega \left({f}_{p}m{T}_{f}\right)\right.\\ \hfill +\left.z[q,n,m]\right)\end{array}$ …”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to save space, and focus on more important parts of the system model, we assume that the received OFDM signals already went through the following process: i) correlation is applied to the Short Training Fields to find the starting time of the received OFDM frames; ii) Carrier Frequency Offset is estimated from the High‐Efficiency Long Training Fields and compensated accordingly; iii) Cyclic Prefix samples are dropped, and the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of each OFDM symbol is computed; iv) through zero‐forcing, the CTF is estimated [27, 28], which can be written as with q = 0… Q − 1, n = 0… N − 1, m = 0… M − 1. leftrightHˆfalse[q,n,mfalse]=p=1PαpωqτpQTωnsinθpωfpmTfright+zfalse[q,n,mfalse] …”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, each estimated CIR, with index m, is stacked on a matrix, also known as range/slow-time map. For a fixed range d i.e., tap index, the slow-time response can be written as [7] h…”
Section: Ofdm Signals and Radar Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of frequencies and the number of signals are estimated by the 2-step ESPRIT. Corresponding Vandermonde matrix, Ã, is constructed from the estimated frequencies, as in (7), and the amplitudes, α, are estimated with the LS method through (5). Then, a confidence analysis is performed to determine the accuracy of each estimated frequency.…”
Section: Iterative Doppler Frequency Estimator (Idofest)mentioning
confidence: 99%