2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of inter- and intra-observer variabilities of catheter reconstruction on multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy of breast cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hensley et al (2003) also reported catheter reconstruction uncertainties which range between 1.1 mm to 2.8 mm and can also affect the measurement data. Inter-and intra-observer variabilities also affect the catheter reconstruction uncertainties in the order of 0.6 mm Kallis et al (2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hensley et al (2003) also reported catheter reconstruction uncertainties which range between 1.1 mm to 2.8 mm and can also affect the measurement data. Inter-and intra-observer variabilities also affect the catheter reconstruction uncertainties in the order of 0.6 mm Kallis et al (2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In individual cases, the coverage index varied up to 1.64%, even though the exact same target volume was considered. 42 In the present study, the deviations between V 100 of the FCT and the ECT were 0.8% and 1.5%, but these values encompass the additional uncertainties associated with a modified target volume introduced by the propagation of the structure from the PCT to the FCT and ECT. A detailed dosimetric analysis is subject of current research and will be presented in a second study.…”
Section: Estimated Ct Images Using Emt Datamentioning
confidence: 48%
“…A study that investigated the dosimetric changes of 13 patients as a result of only the inter‐observer variability of the reconstruction step found that the V 100 of the PTV, that is, the coverage index, deviated 0.27 ± 0.31% (mean ± standard deviation) from the clinically approved treatment plan. In individual cases, the coverage index varied up to 1.64%, even though the exact same target volume was considered 42 . In the present study, the deviations between V 100 of the FCT and the ECT were 0.8% and 1.5%, but these values encompass the additional uncertainties associated with a modified target volume introduced by the propagation of the structure from the PCT to the FCT and ECT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%