Impact of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme on bidi and cigarette consumption: a difference-in-differences analysis

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the importance of decreasing tobacco use to achieve mortality reduction targets of the Sustainable Development Goals in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), evaluations of tobacco control programmes in these settings are scarce. We assessed the impacts of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme (NTCP), as implemented in 42 districts during 2007–2009, on household-reported consumption of bidis and cigarettes.MethodsSecondary analysis of cross-sectional data from nationally representative Household Consumer Expenditure Surveys (1999–2000; 2004–2005 and 2011–2012). Outcomes were: any bidi/cigarette consumption in the household and monthly consumption of bidi/cigarette sticks per person. A difference-in-differences two-part model was used to compare changes in bidi/cigarette consumption between NTCP intervention and control districts, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and time-based heterogeneity.FindingsThere was an overall decline in household-reported bidi and cigarette consumption between 1999–2000 and 2011–2012. However, compared with control districts, NTCP districts had no significantly different reductions in the proportions of households reporting bidi (adjusted OR (AOR): 1.03, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.28) or cigarette (AOR: 1.01 to 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.26) consumption, or for the monthly per person consumption of bidi (adjusted coefficient: 0.07, 95% CI: −0.13 to 0.28) or cigarette (adjusted coefficient: −0.002, 95% CI: −0.26 to 0.26) sticks among bidi/cigarette consuming households.InterpretationOur findings indicate that early implementation of the NTCP may not have produced reductions in tobacco use reflecting generally poor performance against the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control objectives in India. This study highlights the importance of strengthening the implementation and enforcement of tobacco control policies in LMICs to achieve national and international child health and premature NCD mortality reduction targets.

Geographic variation in tobacco use in India: a population-based multilevel cross-sectional study

“…40 41 States are also allowed to develop context-specific information, education and communication resources to match the local needs. 41 42 Therefore, health promotion and tobacco control interventions must be designed for contexts and applied contextually rather than being individually oriented. 9 43 There is the potential to enhance National Tobacco Control Program's (NTCP) implementation at city ward, village and block level as well.…”

“…9 43 There is the potential to enhance National Tobacco Control Program's (NTCP) implementation at city ward, village and block level as well. 41 NTCP is rolled out in 612 districts across 36 states/union territories in India and has a three-tier structure: National-, State-and District Tobacco Control Cell. District Tobacco Control Cells are established to train key stakeholders; information, education and communication activities; school programmes; monitor tobacco control laws; strengthen cessation facilities and coordinate tobacco control activities with Panchayati Raj (traditional local self-governance).…”

Prevention of non-communicable disease: best buys, wasted buys, and contestable buys

“…However, in India, the tax on cigarette products failed to substantially reduce tobacco use even though there was international evidence and strong political support for implementation. This was partly because 85% of smokers in India smoked bidi, a local tobacco that was not taxed 1718. Analysis of case studies of implementing NCD preventive policies in low and middle income countries1920 highlights important contextual economic and other considerations, including relevance to the community of interest; ethical acceptability; possibility of cross-sectoral collaboration; degree of community and stakeholder engagement; affordability, feasibility, and sustainability; and leadership, governance, compliance, and monitoring 15…”

Implementation research for taking tobacco control policies to scale in India: a realist evaluation study protocol

“…Existing social inequities are compounded with contextual factors such as the differences in political and administrative structures, organisational and individual capacities, and the political economy of tobacco production and consumption within the various states. 6 Complex policies and their implementation Policy implementation is complex because of a number of interacting actors involved and the environments in which they are designed and implemented (contexts). 7 8 Several conceptual and theoretical frameworks on understanding policy and its implementation exist across domains such as political science and public administration.…”

“…Existing social inequities are compounded with contextual factors such as the differences in political and administrative structures, organisational and individual capacities, and the political economy of tobacco production and consumption within the various states. 6 …”