Impact of Including Korean Randomized Controlled Trials in Cochrane Reviews of Acupuncture

Abstract

ObjectiveAcupuncture is commonly practiced in Korea and is regularly evaluated in clinical trials. Although many Cochrane reviews of acupuncture include searches of both English and Chinese databases, there is no information on the value of searching Korean databases. This study aimed to investigate the impact of searching Korean databasesand journals for trials eligible for inclusion in existing Cochrane acupuncture reviews.MethodsWe searched 12 Korean databases and seven Korean journals to identify randomised trials meeting the inclusion criteria for acupuncture reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. We compared risk of bias assessments of the Korean trials with the trials included in the Cochrane acupuncture reviews. Where possible, we added data from the Korean trials to the existing meta-analyses in the relevant Cochrane review and conducted sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of the results.ResultsSixteen Korean trials (742 participants) met the inclusion criteria for eight Cochrane acupuncture reviews (125 trials; 13,041 participants). Inclusion of the Korean trials provided data for 20% of existing meta-analyses (24 out of 120). Inclusion of the Korean trials did not change the direction of effect in any of the existing meta-analyses. The effect size and heterogeneity remained mostly unchanged. In only one meta-analysis did the significance change. Compared to the studies included in the Cochrane acupuncture reviews, the risk of bias in the Korean trials was higher in terms of outcome assessor blinding and allocation concealment.ConclusionsMany Korean studies contributed additional data to the existing meta-analyses in Cochrane acupuncture reviews. Although inclusion of these studies did not alter the results of the meta-analyses, comprehensive searches of the literature are important to avoid potential language bias. The identification and inclusion of eligible Korean trials should be considered for reviews of acupuncture.

The prevalence of suicidal thoughts and behaviours among college students: a meta-analysis

“…Second, only English-written studies were included, which may have resulted in a bias towards findings from Western industrialized countries. However, generally speaking, language restricted meta-analyses do not lead to bias (Moher et al 2000; Juni et al 2002; Kim et al 2012). Moreover, in a recent meta-analysis of non-suicidal self-injury prevalence in non-clinical samples (Swannell et al 2014), which also included studies written in Spanish, no Spanish-only written studies were identified, and no studies were identified on the American continent, except from the USA, and Canada.…”

Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines

“…The studies included were selected from the data set of Korean RCTs previously described. 7 In that published study, 12 Korean databases (ie, NANET, RISS, KISS, DBpia, KMbase, KoreaMed, KISTI, NDSL, OASIS, Dlibrary, KoreanTK and RICHIS) were searched from their inception to July 2011. Simple search terms and strategies were used ( table 1 ).…”

Acupuncture for treating whiplash-associated disorder

“…A recent review emphasized that Korean studies should be considered in a systematic review for acupuncture treatment to avoid potential language bias. [ 28 ]…”