2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014jc010588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of improved light calculations on predicted phytoplankton growth and heating in an idealized upwelling‐downwelling channel geometry

Abstract: Ocean ecosystem models require accurate calculations of both hydrodynamics and biology; those calculations in turn require accurate calculation of in-water irradiance. Ecosystem models now achieve great accuracy in their hydrodynamical predictions, and the biological modules are becoming correspondingly sophisticated. The optical calculations are however often oversimplified, to the possible detriment of the physical and biological predictions. We used a recently developed, extremely fast radiative transfer co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fundamentally, the propagation of solar radiation in water is spectrally selective, where blue photons can penetrate much deeper than red photons in oceanic waters. Therefore, for precise description of the distribution of solar radiation in the upper water column, a full‐scale, hyperspectral, numerical model of the radiative transfer in ocean (e.g., Hydrolight) should be used (Mobley et al, ; Mobley & Boss, ; Mobley & Sundman, ). But such a scheme requires extremely high computational power that is not practical for large‐scale, high‐resolution, ocean circulation modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally, the propagation of solar radiation in water is spectrally selective, where blue photons can penetrate much deeper than red photons in oceanic waters. Therefore, for precise description of the distribution of solar radiation in the upper water column, a full‐scale, hyperspectral, numerical model of the radiative transfer in ocean (e.g., Hydrolight) should be used (Mobley et al, ; Mobley & Boss, ; Mobley & Sundman, ). But such a scheme requires extremely high computational power that is not practical for large‐scale, high‐resolution, ocean circulation modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remote sensing community has been developing satellite-derived products of PAR and inherent optical properties (IOPs, such as absorption and backscattering, diffuse attenuation coefficient at 490 nm), which are used to estimate PAR attenuation coefficients. [8][9][10] Also, there are well-established optical models, such as HydroLight and EcoLight, [11][12][13] to provide accurate attenuation of PAR with the depth. All of these products can certainly improve modeling of PAR and its attenuation with depth in physical oceanic models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 However, optical models based on radiative transfer theory have not found wide applications in the numerical oceanic modeling community, mostly because of a high increase in computational cost when they are used with high resolution, data assimilative physical models. For this reason, most existing oceanic physical models [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] use a simplified optical model based on an exponential attenuation of PAR with the depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in computing power and availability of fast and accurate radiative transfer models (e.g. Ecolight, Sequoia Scientific) offer the potential to incorporate comprehensive light field models into aquatic ecosystem models, with the promise of significant improvements in the prediction of biogeochemical and physical properties (Mobley et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%