Impact of Improved Chickpea Cultivation on Profitability and Livelihood of Farmers in Drought-Prone Areas of Bangladesh

Abstract

The cultivation of improved chickpea varieties has been increasing over time that kicks off the local varieties from the farmer’s field. Up-to-date socio-economic information regarding this issue is scanty in Bangladesh. That is why we analyze the profitability of improved chickpea variety and assess the impact of its cultivation on the livelihood of chickpea farmers in the high Barind region of Bangladesh. The values of benefit-cost ratio depict that the improved variety is more profitable in comparison to local chickpea variety; specifically, the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of improved chickpea production is 1.87, while it is only 1.66 for local chickpea. To understand the wellbeing of chickpea farmers, the multidimensional livelihood index (MLI) following sustainable livelihood framework of the Department for International Development (DFID) is used, which constitutes the asset pentagon of five capitals namely human, physical, natural, financial and social capital. The MLI of improved and local chickpea growers are 0.51 and 0.39 respectively which belong in the middle livelihood category. Meanwhile, the MLI reflects that the improved variety cultivars are in a better livelihood condition than the local variety growers. Among all the five capitals of the MLI, the difference between these two groups is the largest in the case of social capital followed by financial capital. Since both groups have achieved far less MLI values than 1, the recommendation is therefore to ensure different types of facilities for the development of people of high Barind tract as well as increasing the production of improved chickpea.
 SAARC J. Agri., 18(1): 129-142 (2020)

Participatory Evaluation of Chickpea Production Technology under Central Punjab Conditions

“…It reflects that there is further potential for production growth with improved technologies, so that farmers can achieve the potential yield. The findings are in confirmation with that reported by ; Nain et al, (2014); Nain et al, (2015); Vijya Lakshmi (2017); Singh et al, (2019); Mitra & Samajdar (2010); Sharma et al, (2020) that in order to tackle this situation, area specific cultivation practices, are need to be developed. The difference between demonstrated yield and yield under demonstrated existing farmer practice is extension gap.…”

An Analysis of Cost and Returns of Chick-pea Cultivation in Chhattisgarh

“…Increased return from input in farms is maximum due to increased productivity aroused due to minimum cost incurred. The finding were supported by Sengar et al [6] and Sharna et al [7].…”

Comparative analysis of chickpea with boro rice in drought-prone areas of Bangladesh

“…Since seed cost is higher for chickpea than boro rice (Table 1), chickpea farmers rely on government organization through which they get high yielding variety chickpea seeds with minimum or free of cost. Furthermore, Sharna et al (2020b) found that governmental institutions in Bangladesh, for instance, the Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) and Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation (BADC) subsidizes chickpea production by providing improved chickpea variety seeds with resistance characteristics, which are more profitable than traditional varieties. Meanwhile, more than 50% of the rice farmers in Bangladesh use seeds from the harvested products (Shelley et al, 2016).…”