2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4966120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of implantation geometry and fluence on structural properties of AlxGa1-xN implanted with thulium

Abstract: Al x Ga 1-x N (x ¼ 0.15 and 0.77) films, grown by halide vapor phase epitaxy, were implanted with 300 keV Tm ions. Implantation damage accumulation is investigated with Rutherford backscattering spectrometry/channeling (RBS/C), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and high resolution X-ray diffraction (XRD). Distinct damage behavior for samples with different AlN contents was found. Surface nanocrystallization occurs for samples with x ¼ 0.15, similar to implantation effects observed in GaN. Samples with x … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, after each processing stage, there are no visible Q x shift of the Al x Ga 1-x N and GaN peak position, which indicates that implantation does not introduce notable strain along the a-axis of the crystal lattice. It is in agreement with previous reports [8,[22][23][24]. The high-temperature annealing resulted in a remarkable lattice recovery; however, some residual с-lattice extension is still observed in both the GaN and Al x Ga 1-x N layers ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, after each processing stage, there are no visible Q x shift of the Al x Ga 1-x N and GaN peak position, which indicates that implantation does not introduce notable strain along the a-axis of the crystal lattice. It is in agreement with previous reports [8,[22][23][24]. The high-temperature annealing resulted in a remarkable lattice recovery; however, some residual с-lattice extension is still observed in both the GaN and Al x Ga 1-x N layers ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The accumulation of implantation damage in Al x Ga 1-x N alloys was also investigated in Ref. [8] for Al 0.15 Ga 0.85 N and Al 0.77 Ga 0.23 N layers implanted under random and channeled geometries with Tm + ions. The damage level was shown to be lower for channeling implantation, and like in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total defect density is expected to be lower when implantation is performed along the c-axis than for the implantation with a certain angle to the c-axis due to the reduced probability for direct collisions with the lattice atoms. 56 Thus, a distinct interaction between Eu 3+ and the existing defects may occur, accounting for the observed changes in Eu1 and Eu2 PL intensity ratio for different implantation geometries. Similarly, trivalent erbium ions were found on substitutional sites for implantation along the c-axis, while they were displaced from this site for implantation with a certain angle to the c-axis.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the previous study, the implantation was performed at an angle of 45° to the NWs’ growth axis (for the same fluence). The total defect density is expected to be lower when implantation is performed along the c -axis than for the implantation with a certain angle to the c -axis due to the reduced probability for direct collisions with the lattice atoms . Thus, a distinct interaction between Eu 3+ and the existing defects may occur, accounting for the observed changes in Eu1 and Eu2 PL intensity ratio for different implantation geometries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in general, to understand the mechanisms of growth defects appearance and damage formation in materials irradiated with energetic ions the various additional analytical techniques are necessary, such as transmission electron microscopy, ion and electron Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, Raman spectroscopy, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, small‐angle X‐ray scattering, positron annihilation spectroscopy etc. . Applications of these techniques provide the unique possibilities to study radiation effects in wide range of implantation depths and gain the information, complementary to X‐ray diffraction investigations, on defect configurations and their phase composition, as well as amorphization and recrystallization processes in ion‐implanted layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%