2014
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000438024.10375.2d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Immunosuppression on Recall Immune Responses to Influenza Vaccination in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients

Abstract: Background The recommendation by the American Society of Transplantation for annual trivalent inactivated influenza vaccination greater than 3 to 6 months post-kidney transplantation provides a unique opportunity to test the in vivo impact of immunosuppression on recall T- and B-cell responses to influenza vaccination. Methods This study took advantage of recent breakthroughs in the single-cell quantification of human peripheral blood B-cell responses to prospectively evaluate both B- and T-cell responses to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(35 reference statements)
6
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these levels are very high, no one truly knew how these levels translate into protection from the virus. These findings were unexpected, as we already know that compared to the regular population, transplant patients who developed infection have a blunted immune response and a low rate of seroconversion [ 27 ].. The fact that our transplant patients mounted a strong humoral immune response to natural infection makes us believe that they will elicit the same, if not stronger, immune response with future vaccination when it becomes available for this age group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although these levels are very high, no one truly knew how these levels translate into protection from the virus. These findings were unexpected, as we already know that compared to the regular population, transplant patients who developed infection have a blunted immune response and a low rate of seroconversion [ 27 ].. The fact that our transplant patients mounted a strong humoral immune response to natural infection makes us believe that they will elicit the same, if not stronger, immune response with future vaccination when it becomes available for this age group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Consistently, we found that the third month since treatment is the most susceptible period for PI. Under such circumstance, propensity to infection is determined by the rate and magnitude of the immunosuppression and this may explain the exclusion of age as a risk factor. As such, we have identified five bona fide risk factors with the IgG titer as the top one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing of the immunoglobulin variable regions isolated from sorted single ASCs producing high affinity influenza-specific antibodies confirmed that the majority of the ASC response arose from memory B cells. Cowan et al (68) built on these observations to quantify the influenza-specific ASC response in stable renal transplant recipients. They observed that the early influenza-specific ASCs response to influenza vaccination was significantly reduced compared to healthy controls.…”
Section: Memory B Cells In Human Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%