2016
DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2016.1212396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of imagery rescripting on adverse self-defining memories and post-recall working selves in a non-clinical sample: a pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that IR enhances positive affect is rather remarkable, given the fact that most IR interventions currently focus on the reduction of negative emotions associated with memories of aversive events. In line with other studies (Çili, Pettit, & Stopa, 2017; Watson, Rapee, & Todorov, 2016), our results suggest that increased positive emotionality might constitute a mechanism for the effectiveness of IR. Specifically, it has been proposed that increasing patients’ sense of control and mastery about distressing images or memories play an important role in rescripting-based treatments (Arntz, 2012; Arntz et al, 2007; Krakow et al, 2001; Long et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The fact that IR enhances positive affect is rather remarkable, given the fact that most IR interventions currently focus on the reduction of negative emotions associated with memories of aversive events. In line with other studies (Çili, Pettit, & Stopa, 2017; Watson, Rapee, & Todorov, 2016), our results suggest that increased positive emotionality might constitute a mechanism for the effectiveness of IR. Specifically, it has been proposed that increasing patients’ sense of control and mastery about distressing images or memories play an important role in rescripting-based treatments (Arntz, 2012; Arntz et al, 2007; Krakow et al, 2001; Long et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…At follow-up, participants rated the memory as less important for their sense of self than at the first ImRs session. They also reported higher state self-esteem and positive affect, as well as reduced negative affect and anxiety after recalling the memory ( Çili et al, 2017 ). Taken together, these results seem to indicate that ImRs strongly affects what a person thinks or has learned about him/herself (i.e., self-representation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have suggested that individuals have different self-representations that are activated in response to memory recall, and whose accessibility may be modified as a result of ImRs (e.g. Brewin, 2006; Brewin et al , 2009; Çili et al , 2017). However, based on the results of this study, it is not possible to suggest how probable mechanisms of ImRs are.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%