2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40621-021-00298-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM coding transition on trauma hospitalization trends among young adults in 12 states

Abstract: Background We aimed to estimate the impact of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) coding transition on traumatic injury-related hospitalization trends among young adults across a geographically and demographically diverse group of U.S. states. Methods Interrupted time series analyses were conducted using statewide inpatient databases from 12 states and including traumatic injury-related ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate and minimize this, we previously conducted a study examining the impact of the coding transition on trends in trauma admissions among young adults by injury mechanism, type, and severity, and the results of that study informed our selection of covariates for the current study. 41 Another limitation of this study was the fact that, because patient identification numbers in the databases used are state-specific, information on readmissions and return ED visits that occurred in states other than the state in which the patient was originally hospitalized was not available. Finally, this study included only 10 states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate and minimize this, we previously conducted a study examining the impact of the coding transition on trends in trauma admissions among young adults by injury mechanism, type, and severity, and the results of that study informed our selection of covariates for the current study. 41 Another limitation of this study was the fact that, because patient identification numbers in the databases used are state-specific, information on readmissions and return ED visits that occurred in states other than the state in which the patient was originally hospitalized was not available. Finally, this study included only 10 states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to use the General Equivalence Mapping minimum severity method for converting ICD-10-CM codes to ICD-9-CM codes because this strategy resulted in minimal disruption in trends across the coding transition. 41 Mechanism of injury was defined by mapping diagnosis codes into categories according to the frameworks recommended by the CDC. 42 – 44 Hospital characteristics, such as trauma center status and level, were not able to be considered because hospital identifiers that could be used for linkage to other databases with such characteristics were not available for Georgia, Kansas, or Missouri.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concern about data misclassification is perhaps magnified by the fact that the study period overlaps with the ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM coding system transition. To minimize the effects of this transition, we previously conducted a study that examined its impact on trends in traumatic injury–related hospitalizations among young adults by injury mechanism, type, and severity, and the results of that study informed our selection and definition of covariates in the present study [ 41 ]. The prevalence of many injury types was affected by the coding transition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original ICDPIC program was developed for use with ICD-9-CM codes, but ICDPIC-R allows the use of both ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes, with options to calculate injury severity directly from ICD-10-CM codes (based on diagnosis-specific mortality estimates from the National Trauma Data Bank) or indirectly by first mapping ICD-10-CM codes to ICD-9-CM codes using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS') General Equivalence Mapping (GEM) tables. We chose to use the GEM minimum severity method for converting ICD-10-CM codes to ICD-9-CM codes because this strategy resulted in minimal disruption in trends across the coding transition [ 41 ]. Hospital characteristics, such as trauma center status and level, were not able to be considered because hospital identifiers that could be used to link the SID to other data at the hospital level were not available for Georgia, Kansas, or Missouri.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work will illustrate the methodology using ICD-10-CM and how we approached linking data across ICD versions. Few, if any, data sources to date have converted older data in ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM or ICD-10 to ICD-11 though some crosswalks exist for these specific purposes [45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Identifying a Target Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%