2018
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of hurricane Harvey on the results of regional flood frequency analysis

Abstract: Hurricane Harvey was an unprecedented event that resulted in immense damage to life and property. As a result, it is important to determine how this event, as well as past and future events like it, will impact engineering design equations that are based upon historical data, such as flood frequency analysis equations. This study seeks to contribute to this discussion by evaluating the extent to which Harvey influenced estimations of instantaneous peak discharges in rural ungauged basins in southeast Texas. Re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this figure there were no clear clusters, and large and small changes in the 100-year peak flows were generally distributed throughout the entire study area. These changes in return period floods are similar to those that occurred where Harvey actually made landfall, which resulted in an average increase in the 100-year flood of 30% (McDonald & Naughton, 2018). This outcome demonstrates that the impact of simulating Harvey on flood frequency statistics is similar, and in some cases greater, in other areas along the Texas coast.…”
Section: Flood Frequency Statisticssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From this figure there were no clear clusters, and large and small changes in the 100-year peak flows were generally distributed throughout the entire study area. These changes in return period floods are similar to those that occurred where Harvey actually made landfall, which resulted in an average increase in the 100-year flood of 30% (McDonald & Naughton, 2018). This outcome demonstrates that the impact of simulating Harvey on flood frequency statistics is similar, and in some cases greater, in other areas along the Texas coast.…”
Section: Flood Frequency Statisticssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…It is estimated that approximately 8%–19% of Hurricane Harvey's intensity was attributed to climate change (Risser & Wehner, 2017; van Oldenborgh et al, 2017). This intensity had a significant impact on the computation of design floods, as the flooding from Harvey increased the 100‐year peak flow in the region by an average of 28% using flood frequency statistics (McDonald & Naughton, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor system (MRMS), which utilizes data from over 180 NEXRAD radars and covers the conterminous United States at 1-km spatial resolution with a 2-min update frequency (Zhang et al 2016), has shown more accuracy during Hurricane Harvey event than did NASA's Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) v6 product and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) gridded gauge only precipitation production; and has good agreement with the Harris County Flood Control District (HCFCD) rain gauge data (Chen et al 2020;Li et al 2020). This study, again, uses Hurricane Harvey as the study case, since it was considered a 100-500-yr flood event, which caused the local streams' return period reduced 20%-35% after the event (Vu and Mishra 2019;McDonald and Naughton 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak discharge has also been considered as a major variable in univariate analyses. For Hurricane Harvey's flood return period estimations, McDonald and Naughton (2019) applied the Log Pearson III distribution and Nyaupane et al. (2018) applied the GEV to discharge data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak discharge has also been considered as a major variable in univariate analyses. For Hurricane Harvey's flood return period estimations, McDonald and Naughton (2019) applied the Log Pearson III distribution and Nyaupane et al (2018) applied the GEV to discharge data. However, these univariate assessments miss potentially important dependencies between hazards and misrepresent the likelihood of high-impact conditions (Harr et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%