“…Although current research of the effects of programs of such a kind raise questions of different effects in rural and urban areas (McCoy et al, 2016), or are related to child's gender or program service model, for example, whether it includes home visitation component or not (Miller, Farkas, & Duncan, 2014), most of the data firmly underlines that exposure to quality programs may be important for children from families at risk, i.e. children in non-parental care, from low income families (Magnuson & Shager, 2010), minority children (Duncan & Sojourner, 2013;Stahmer & Carter, 2005), children with disabilities (Blackmore, Alyward, & Grace, 2016), and that effects may extend beyond child developmental outcomes (cognition, communication, social and emotional skills, autonomy) to better family and childcare outcomes (Johnson et al, 2012;Nievar et al, 2011). Research has also revealed the meaning of good quality ECEC programs not only related to structural and process quality, but also to naming the key elements, such as culturally sensitive practice when it comes to children from minority groups (Felfe & Huber, 2017) or integrated early intervention for children with developmental delays or disability (Odom, Buysse, & Soukakou, 2011).…”