2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.87.084008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of higher-order modes on the detection of binary black hole coalescences

Abstract: The inspiral and merger of black-hole binary systems are a promising source of gravitational waves for the array of advanced interferometric ground-based gravitational-wave detectors currently being commissioned. The most effective method to look for a signal with a well understood waveform, such as the binary black hole signal, is matched filtering against a library of model waveforms. While current model waveforms are comprised solely of the dominant radiation mode, the quadrupole mode, it is known that ther… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
71
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(53 reference statements)
4
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since most of the energy is radiated in the = 2, m = 2 mode, most analytical modelling work has focused on this mode, and it is the only mode that has been considered so far in searches for compact binaries. However, several studies have investigated the effects of other modes on gravitational wave detection algorithms [27,54,86]. Since there can be a significant mismatch between waveforms that include other modes and waveforms that only include the dominant mode, these modes will likely need to be calibrated in analytical models in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most of the energy is radiated in the = 2, m = 2 mode, most analytical modelling work has focused on this mode, and it is the only mode that has been considered so far in searches for compact binaries. However, several studies have investigated the effects of other modes on gravitational wave detection algorithms [27,54,86]. Since there can be a significant mismatch between waveforms that include other modes and waveforms that only include the dominant mode, these modes will likely need to be calibrated in analytical models in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13); see Sec. II C 1 for details] between waveforms that include subdominant modes and waveforms that only include the dominant mode [13][14][15][16]. This raises the question, by neglecting subdominant modes has the sensitivity of BBH searches been overstated?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of Ref. [14] used waveforms generated from numerical relativity as both template and signal to measure mismatch when subdominant modes are not included in templates. They considered systems with total mass M > 100 M ⊙ and mass ratios 1 ≤ q ≤ 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reconstructed waveforms are compared to 102 BBH waveforms that have been used previously to investigate the feasibility of detecting precession and higher order modes [48,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. We also include an additional four new simulations with intrinsic parameters motivated by parameter estimation studies of GW150914 [29].…”
Section: E Overlap Between Reconstructed Waveform and Bbh Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%