2020
DOI: 10.24084/repqj18.325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of High PV Penetration on Transient Stability — a Case Study on the U.S. ERCOT System

Abstract: This study was performed to assess the impact of high photovoltaic (PV) penetration on transient stability using a series of hypothetical models of the ERCOT system. This was done by calculating the critical clearing time (CCT) when faulting various busses. Varying levels of PV penetration were used to study the system transient stability. For each case 15% wind penetration was also included. It was found that under the PV volt/Var control with plant-level GE SolarControl settings, PV penetration at lower leve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature Review Synthetic inertia has three desired functions: keeping the initial ROCOF value within ride-through capabilities of generators and loads; delaying nadir time to earn time for primary frequency response, and limiting the frequency nadir to avoid load/generator disconnection (in some systems with very low inertia). While few studies have studied PV synthetic inertia control, most inverter inertia control studies focus on wind generation, electric vehicles or inverter-based energy storage, HVDC, and virtual synchronous generators (VSG) [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. As of 2018, U.S. power grids have no standard or requirement on synthetic inertia control for inverter-based resources, as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Pv Synthetic Inertia Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature Review Synthetic inertia has three desired functions: keeping the initial ROCOF value within ride-through capabilities of generators and loads; delaying nadir time to earn time for primary frequency response, and limiting the frequency nadir to avoid load/generator disconnection (in some systems with very low inertia). While few studies have studied PV synthetic inertia control, most inverter inertia control studies focus on wind generation, electric vehicles or inverter-based energy storage, HVDC, and virtual synchronous generators (VSG) [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. As of 2018, U.S. power grids have no standard or requirement on synthetic inertia control for inverter-based resources, as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Pv Synthetic Inertia Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensuring power grid reliability is important to the society and economy [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. With the increase of renewable penetration, the characteristics of the power grid is changing [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hotovoltaic (PV) and wind generation are increasing in many power grids [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The increase of PV penetration has an inevitable impact on the power grid primary frequency response due to the de-commitment of conventional units and consequent loss of inertia [15,[19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%