2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0929-1393(01)00185-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of growth stage on the bacterial community structure along maize roots, as determined by metabolic and genetic fingerprinting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
114
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
114
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum acid phosphatase activity was observed at 75 DAT for rice (0.206 mg PNP/g h), 90 DAS for sorghum (0.194 mg PNP/g h) and pearl millet (0.201 mg PNP/g h), 50 DAS for soybean (0.127 mg PNP/g h), and 30 DAS for maize (0.154 mg PNP/g h) and, 50 DAS as well as 75 DAS for finger millet (0.180 mg PNP/g h), respectively. Similar observations about the effect of different micro-organism on acid phosphates were observed in maize [9,14]. Different crop growth stages showed different amount of acid phosphatase activity, it might be due to secretion of root exudates and biochemical changes in plant system [15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The maximum acid phosphatase activity was observed at 75 DAT for rice (0.206 mg PNP/g h), 90 DAS for sorghum (0.194 mg PNP/g h) and pearl millet (0.201 mg PNP/g h), 50 DAS for soybean (0.127 mg PNP/g h), and 30 DAS for maize (0.154 mg PNP/g h) and, 50 DAS as well as 75 DAS for finger millet (0.180 mg PNP/g h), respectively. Similar observations about the effect of different micro-organism on acid phosphates were observed in maize [9,14]. Different crop growth stages showed different amount of acid phosphatase activity, it might be due to secretion of root exudates and biochemical changes in plant system [15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Studies have shown that rhizospheric fungal and bacterial communities of a wide range of plants (i.e., Arabidopsis, Medicago, maize, pea, wheat and sugar beet) change according to a plant developmental gradient (Baudoin et al, 2002;Mougel et al, 2006;Houlden et al, 2008;Micallef et al, 2009a). In these studies the microbial communities were assessed through automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis or denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis techniques that produce a fingerprint of the community structure but not of its members' identity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spermosphere and rhizosphere microbial populations are influenced by the type and quantity of exudates from plant seeds and roots, as well as plant development status and sampling location (Campbell and Greaves, 1990;Buyer et al, 1999;Lugtenberg et al, 1999;Andrews and Harris, 2000;Duineveld et al, 2001;Whipps, 2001;Baudoin et al, 2002;de Boer et al, 2006). Although the plant can influence the abundance, diversity and composition of rhizosphere microbial communities, the role of soil microbial community composition and the soil organic matter cannot be neglected (Toal et al, 2000;Marschner et al, 2001;De Ridder-Duine et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%