We have used ultraviolet and inverse photoemission spectroscopy to determine the transport gaps (E t ) of C 60 and diindenoperylene (DIP), and the photovoltaic gap (E PVG ) of five prototypical donor/ acceptor interfaces used in organic photovoltaic cells (OPVCs). The transport gap of C 60 (2.5 6 0.1) eV and DIP (2.55 6 0.1) eV at the interface is the same as in pristine films. We find nearly the same energy loss of ca 0.5 eV for all material pairs when comparing the open circuit voltage measured for corresponding OPVCs and E PVG . V C 2012 American Institute of Physics.The energy level alignment at the donor/acceptor (D/A) heterojunction of an organic photovoltaic cell (OPVC) is decisive for its performance. In particular, the energy offset between the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital level of the acceptor [LUMO(A)] and the highest occupied molecular orbital level of the donor [HOMO(D)] sets an upper limit for the open circuit voltage V oc . 1-6 This has been expressed as e Á V oc ¼ HOMO(D) À LUMO(A) À D, where e is the elementary charge and D a loss term, which has been suggested to be related to the exciton binding energy 2 or radiative and nonradiative temperature dependent losses. 1,3,5 The HOMO(D)/ LUMO(A) offset is denoted in various ways in the literature, such as charge transfer gap, intermolecular gap, or donor/ acceptor gap and is often estimated by optical spectroscopy, 5,6 or electrical characterization, e.g., cyclic voltammetry, 6 reverse saturation current analysis, 2,7 or temperature dependent measurements of the open circuit voltage. 4,5 To avoid ambiguity, we use the term photovoltaic gap (E PVG ) (cf Fig. 1). To minimize energy losses during the photon harvesting process, it is desirable to maximize E PVG within the constraint of keeping the LUMO-LUMO (DE L ) and HOMO-HOMO level offsets (DE H ) sufficiently large to drive charge separation across the D/A junction. To quantify D for unraveling its physical origin, it is mandatory to have reliable E PVG values for comparison with corresponding V oc values. Unfortunately, simple models for estimating the energy levels at organicorganic interfaces are often invalid (e.g., vacuum level alignment 8,9 ), and more involved models have been brought forward. 10,11 For the time being, experimental determination of interface energetics is indispensable to understand the processes inside an OPVC based on reliable values of E PVG , but only few pertinent studies have been conducted to date. [12][13][14][15] The present study focuses on E PVG values at prototypical organic D/A pairs formed between four organic semiconductors [sexithiophene (6T), fullerene (C 60 ), diindenoperylene (DIP, chemical structure shown in Fig. 1), and poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT)] determined using the combination of ultraviolet and inverse photoemission spectroscopy (UPS and IPES). The experiment for DIP/C 60 demonstrates that E PVG can be reliably inferred from measuring the offset between the D/A HOMO levels, once the acceptor's transport gap (E t ) is known and no changes of E...