Impact of Grain Subsidy Reform on the Land Use of Smallholder Farms: Evidence from Huang-Huai-Hai Plain in China

Abstract

Smallholder farms have played an essential role in agricultural production and food security. In order to increase farm size, the Chinese government announced a reform of the grain subsidy program in 2015. Under the reform, 20% of the aggregate input subsidy, as well as the pilot subsidy to large-scale farmers and the incremental part of the agricultural support and protection subsidy budget, were used to support increasing farm size. This study evaluated the impact of China’s grain subsidy reform on the land use of smallholder farms to investigate whether the reform achieved its goal. Based on 2063 samples obtained from the 2013–2015 Survey for Agriculture and Village Economy data in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, we conducted a difference-in-difference model to solve the problem of missing counterfactual states in policy evaluation. Farms from Henan and Shandong were assigned to the treatment group, and farms from Hebei were assigned to the control group. The results revealed that the average treatment effect on the treated of the impact of the grain subsidy reform on the wheat-sown area was −25% (0.10 ha). Furthermore, there was heterogeneity in regard to the subsidy reform effects in different sown-area groups. The reform had the most significant impact on the smallest farmers. We also found that China’s grain subsidy reform had a significant and positive effect on the amount of outflow land area, while the impact of subsidy reform on land tenure was insignificant. Our findings suggest that while encouraging large-scale farms, it is necessary to take into account farmers’ small-scale operations and gradually promote the transformation of small-scale operations to large-scale operations. The Chinese government should strengthen the supervision of land use to achieve the goal of ensuring food security.

Can Agricultural Machinery Harvesting Services Reduce Cropland Abandonment? Evidence from Rural China

“…This study used micro-level data from the 2019 and 2020 Survey for Agriculture and Village Economy (SAVE) [47,48]. This survey is launched and conducted annually by the Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development (IAED) at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS).…”

The Effectiveness Assessment of Agricultural Subsidy Policies on Food Security: Evidence from China’s Poverty-Stricken Villages

“…Agricultural subsidies are one of the most effective policies for governments around the world to support and protect agricultural development, and China is no exception [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Since 2004, the Chinese government has gradually established an agricultural subsidy system to issue subsidies for purchasing fine seeds, directly subsidize grain growers, and distribute general subsidies for purchasing agricultural supplies [ 4 , 5 ]. The purpose of China’s agricultural subsidy policy is to raise farmers’ enthusiasm for planting grain, ensure food security, and increase farmers’ income [ 6 ].…”

“…However, some scholars hold different views on the above research [ 5 , 20 ]. Some believe that the government’s agricultural subsidies cannot effectively raise the enthusiasm of farmers for grain production.…”

Impacts of COVID-19 on Nutritional Intake in Rural China: Panel Data Evidence

“…We used the 2019-2020 Survey for Agriculture and Village Economy (SAVE) data collected by the Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences [53][54][55]. The 2019-2020 SAVE data record the annual production, consumption, expenditure, and income of the rural households and cover 5818 observations in the Hebei, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Anhui, Fujian, Henan, Hunan, Sichuan, and Yunnan provinces of China (Figure 1).…”